If Prometheum says Ethereum is a security, the SEC doesn’t need to specifically approve that, but it may present an opportunity for the SEC, not to have to declare one way or another on its own, but just sort of as a result change its position. The SEC would then be required to engage the CFTC, which it appears they have not done, and come to some process through which products which are only overseen by the CFTC today — futures products — would somehow morph into products which are traded on platforms overseen by both agencies. The law blog identified at least some precedent for that, but it raises a whole host of questions.

• SEO 支持的內容和 PR 分發。 今天得到放大。
• PlatoData.Network 垂直生成人工智能。 賦予自己力量。 訪問這裡。
• 柏拉圖愛流。 Web3 智能。 知識放大。 訪問這裡。
• 柏拉圖ESG。 碳， 清潔科技, 能源， 環境， 太陽能， 廢物管理。 訪問這裡。
• 柏拉圖健康。 生物技術和臨床試驗情報。 訪問這裡。
• 資源： https://www.coindesk.com/consensus-magazine/2024/04/18/it-can-be-said-with-confidence-the-sec-is-investigating-ethereum-consensys-bill-hughes-talks-crypto-law/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=headlines