Alexei Navalny is a noted leader of the Russian opposition. His “Anti-Corruption Foundation” (FBK) has been a thorn in President Vladimir Putin’s side for many years.
Though the FBK has been locked out of mainstream politics — much as Navalny has been blocked from running in recent elections — its investigations have managed to garner an audience that Putin has found stubbornly difficult to disperse. That audience has transformed into protests across the country.
On top of it all, Navalny’s story highlights an important use case for Bitcoin in a country that effectively sanctions media that don’t toe the official line. Long touted as a means of getting money to people subject to government oppression, Bitcoin should be a serious consideration for journalists in Russia, many of whom face a regime that is going to great lengths to silence and effectively sanction them.
A recent timeline of Navalny
Navalny’s FBK went on the Russian Ministry of Justice’s “Foreign Agents” list at the end of 2019. Navalny has said that continuous fines as a result of that status will force him to close down FBK, and possibly re-open it under a different name. At the moment, however, Navalny’s primary concern is his current incarceration.
Russian authorities arrested Alexei Navalny on Jan. 17, as the opposition leader returned from Germany where he’d been treated for Novichok poisoning that he attributes to Kremlin agents. Immediately afterwards, Navalny’s team released an investigation into a palatial estate near the Black Sea that they allege belongs to Putin.
On Feb. 2, Navalny was sentenced to two years and 8 months in jail on trumped-up charges over a sentence suspended in 2013 for embezzlement. Russian law, moreover, prevents anyone with such a record from running for political office (which many identified as the true motivation for the conviction eight years ago). This past weekend, a court rejected his appeal and fined him another 850,000 rubles ($11,000) for a separate charge of defaming a veteran. The veteran in that case had appeared in a pro-Putin ad that Navalny had criticized.
It has also come to light that a Bitcoin address associated with Navalny has seen a surge in donations since his poisoning in August and especially following his arrest last month.
Leonid Volkov, a long-time ally of Navalny’s and a project manager for the FBK specified to Cointelegraph that the Bitcoin in question goes “to fund the operations of Navalny’s political offices across the country (not the FBK!).” Why, you might ask? The FBK only accepts donations from bank cards issued to Russian citizens which, Volkov said, “makes the whole ‘foreign agent’ story especially stupid.”
The Bitcoin donations go to Navalny’s network of outposts across Russia, which conduct independent local investigations into corruption but which are not financially bound to the FBK. Volkov further specified that he, not Navalny, is the proprietor of the Bitcoin wallet, which is related to the whole issue of foreign funding:
“The network of Navalny offices was never recognised [as] a foreign agent. I accept these bitcoin donations as a Russian citizen, then I go to localbitcoins and sell them for Russian Roubles, and, finally, I donate these roubles as a Russian citizen to the legal entity, which operates the network of regional Navalny offices.”
The whole system seems to work for now, even though Volkov says that BTC has never been more than 15% of their donations in a given year.
Beyond just facilitating a wider net for fundraising, the Navalny team’s use of Bitcoin has implications for an ever-expanding circle of opposition voices in Russian media who are seeing their revenue scrutinized or cut off. The Putin regime is eagerly converting the “foreign agents” list into a mechanism for financially sanctioning Russian citizens involved in opposition politics. Despite limited adoption in the country’s donations, the problems of funding journalism in modern-day Russia clearly show a use-case for Bitcoin adoption.
The “Foreign Agents” list
Russia has maintained a growing list of “Inoagents,” or “foreign agents,” since 2012. Originally, these were NGOs engaged in political activity, which the regime accused of receiving funding from abroad. 74 entities are in the current list. Alongside Navalny’s FBK, it includes a number of non-profits working against the spread of HIV and educating the public about sexual assault. In 2017, the list expanded to media outlets linked to the U.S.-funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Voice of America families.
When an organization appears in the foreign agents list, any time their work or message is broadcast in Russia, it must feature a lengthy disclaimer that identifies the source as a foreign agent. This is a major interference to NGOs trying to run public campaigns and a death knell to many journalistic projects who depend on both brevity and credibility in order to reach an audience. Designated foreign agents must also make intensive budgetary disclosures every quarter.
This past December, new amendments allowed authorities to put individual journalists on the list.
“People still remember what happened during the Stalin times, with the label ‘vrag naroda,’ and this is something similar to that,” Gulnoza Said told Cointelegraph, referring to a weighted Soviet term that translates to “enemy of the people.”
An attack on journalism
Said coordinates the Committee to Protect Journalists’ Europe and Central Asia programs, which includes grants to journalists in emergency situations — oftentimes life or death. “At times it’s been very difficult for us to send money to Russian journalists,” she said. “Russia doesn’t have the same international banking system as everyone now.”
On Feb. 18, Reporters Without Borders denounced still more changes coming to expand the foreign agents law. Jeanne Cavelier, the head of RSF’s Eastern Europe and Central Asia desk, said:
“This law is so vague and its scope is so broad that, in the absence of exhaustive verification of its application, the authorities will be able to choose their targets and impose insane fines on whomever they see fit.”
Denis Kamalyagin is the editor-in-chief of newspaper Pskovskaya Guberniya and one of the journalists added to the foreign agents list in December. Kamalyagin told Cointelegraph he was now required to file quarterly reports on income and expenses, a process that has not been standardized. “There is no template yet, so everyone filled theirs out after their own fashion,” he said. It likewise remains unclear what sort of fines the government will level at the Inoagents if they do not file in accordance with the new demands. The new laws, however, include a punishment of up to 5 years in jail for failure to file.
Meanwhile, “foreign agent” has already proved a remarkably expansive term. The “journalists” added to the list in December included one Daria Apakhonchich, an artist and teacher with the Red Cross whose crime seems to have been political posts on social media. The Red Cross has since fired her.
While the financial burden and scrutiny placed upon “foreign agents” is obvious, the Putin regime’s usage of the list clearly functions as a form of financial sanctions upon public figures opposed to the regime. To fulfill new opaque reporting requirements, Kamalyagin said he was filing for a joint LLC with Apakhonchich and another listed journalist, Sergey Markelov to be registered in Pskov. But that’s hardly the end of either the “foreign agents” list’s requirements, nor the sorts of sanctions available.
Regarding the prospect of further expansion of the governmental list, Gulnoza Said said, “Next in line is anybody who has been critical of the Russian authorities, and they are going to be included in this list unless they are already in some other list.”
Critical to this conversation is Svetlana Prokopyeva, a journalist from Pskov who formerly worked at Kamalyagin’s Pskovskaya Guberniya and more recently at Radio Liberty. Prokopyeva ended up on Russia’s list of extremists after comments she made in an interview asking about the origin of a suicide bombing in 2019. A court found her guilty of “justifying terrorism.”
Initially facing an 8-year jail sentence, Prokopyeva instead received a half-million ruble ($6,700) fine last summer — which is roughly a year’s income for the average Russian. A military court overturned Prokopyeva’s appeal at a hearing earlier this month, during which the prosecutor labeled the journalist “a mouthpiece of the West.” Despite not doing time, Prokopyeva is now labelled an extremist. More intensive than the foreign agent list, Prokopyeva’s bank accounts remain frozen and her passport confiscated along with all of her equipment.
Unable to work and prohibited from accessing her money, Prokopyeva had limited avenues to pay the fine. Prokopyeva noted that sending money directly to her could legally constitute terrorist financing, so she turned to her mother, who used an account with mobile bank Tinkoff to receive donations to pay her daughter’s fine — likely possible because the mobile-only Tinkoff is less concerned with the risk of internal “political exposure” than the more regime-tied brick-and-mortar banking giants of the Russian Federation.
Despite managing to pay her fine with her mother’s help, Prokopyeva will remain on the terror list for a year. And despite still having access to their bank accounts, the journalists recently added to the list of foreign agents are still waiting to learn what sort of fines are awaiting them.
A consistent criticism of Bitcoin from authorities is that it facilitates sanctions evasion and money laundering. If you were looking to stand up for the Putin regime’s behavior in this area, you could paint Bitcoin as a mechanism to launder money rather than a politically neutral means of transferring value.
While there’s no fair reason to respect Putin’s sanctions on journalists anyway, the point is not that Bitcoin can provide and hide foreign funding to malignant entities of the people. The point is that ending up on the “foreign agents” list has little to do with where any of these people’s money is coming from and has everything to do with who they have angered. So here, Bitcoin is a promising safety mechanism for an industry in danger.
Real Estate Giant Teams up with Gemini to Buy Bitcoin and Allow BTC Rent Payments
Caruso, one of the largest estate companies in the US, has entered the BTC space with an undisclosed investment. The organization also revealed it will begin accepting bitcoin as payment for rent following a partnership with Gemini – the cryptocurrency exchange founded by the Winklevoss twins.
Pay Rent with Bitcoin
Without specifying the precise amount, Caruso announced earlier that it had made a “significant initial investment” in the primary cryptocurrency as part of its treasury management strategy. The move has made the company “the first to adopt the technology in the real estate industry.”
The firm completed the purchase through a partnership with Gemini, a US-based cryptocurrency exchange and custodian. The innovation reinforced the company’s confidence in the digitizing space.
Additionally, the firm enabled its tenants to pay rent with bitcoin, should they choose to do so.
Rick Caruso, founder, and CEO of the company weighed in on the topic:
”We believe that cryptocurrency is here to stay. We believe that bitcoin is the right investment for us. We’ve allocated a percentage of what would normally go into the capital market into bitcoin.”
The billionaire went further and stated crypto is a long-term resolution and ”it’s not about the next year or five years”.
”We are thrilled to partner with Caruso as they continue to push the real estate sector to new heights by embracing cryptocurrency for the benefit of both their customer experience and their own business operations. We are excited to help them execute their digital asset treasury strategy and advise them more broadly throughout their cryptocurrency journey.” – commented Gemini’s CEO Tyler Winklevoss.
The Los Angeles-based company has become a part of the growing institutional adoption of bitcoin around the globe. According to experts, companies like MicroStrategy, MassMutual, Tesla, and more are a vital factor behind BTC’s recent price increase.
Bitcoin as a Form of Payment
While Caruso may be the first firm from the real estate industry to adopt BTC as a payment method, companies from other sectors have well preceded it. Most recently, the popular NBA team Sacramento Kings said it will give the option to its players to receive their salaries in the primary cryptocurrency.
Another fresh example is the UK private jet company – PrivateFly. The organization revealed that nearly 20% of its yearly payments were paid in bitcoin.
Binance Coin, BitTorrent Token, Ontology Price Analysis: 10 April
Binance Coin registered huge gains in the past few weeks. BitTorrent Token could consolidate before seeing recovery, while Ontology could face selling pressure if it falls out of the rising channel it was trading within.
Binance Coin [BNB]
From March 25 to April 10, at the time of writing, BNB has climbed from $225 to $473. Using the Fibonacci tool for its move from $225 to $356, where BNB had faced some resistance in early April, extension levels were plotted. These levels have been reached, and more ambitious targets for BNB lie in the $550 region.
It is not out of the question that BNB reaches these levels, especially with the BNB quarterly burning set for later this month. On the hourly, the RSI continued to stay above neutral 50 to show an uptrend in progress, and no divergence was seen. The Stochastic RSI was dropping toward oversold territory.
BitTorrent Token [BTT]
On the hourly chart, BTT broke out of a descending channel but was rejected at the $0.01 resistance level. Sometimes, breakouts from descending channel consolidate within a range before reaching toward the peak of the channel.
This could be what is happening for BTT. It has resistance at $0.01 and support at $0.0075. The breakout point at $0.0085 is also likely to serve as support.
Trading volume was trending downward. The Awesome Oscillator showed bearish pressure was present, although it was not strong.
ONT was also trading within a channel, but this one was ascending. Again, the short-term outlook placed ONT right beside a level of importance. There was resistance for ONT at the $2.05 level, and support from the lower boundary of the rising channel.
ONT began trading within this pattern about three days prior to the time of writing. A session close beneath the channel would likely see ONT face further selling pressure to take it to the base of the channel at $1.72. THE OBV has been on an uptrend in recent days but the MACD was beginning to drop.
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
IOTA co-founder discloses Coordicide’s release date
The cryptocurrency market has seen the altcoins surge despite the correction witnessed in the short term. IOTA, the altcoin ranked 27th on CoinMarketCap, has grown dramatically on the charts right from the start of the month.
IOTA co-founder Dominik Schiener recently did one of his systematic AMA sessions. He elucidated some of the most important concepts about the development of IOTA and its updates, Chrysalis and Coordicide.
To begin with, Schiener answered a question about the challenges that IOTA 2.0 or Coordicide might face in its deployment process. One of the issues faced by the group of developers was to discover and fix bugs on major components.
The co-founder further shared his optimism on the progress in the AMA session.
“Coordicide will fully decentralize IOTA. On the theoretical side we are doing very well to deliver what is promised which is a fully decentralized IOTA. I think the biggest risk is the implementation.”
At this very moment, IOTA targetted Q4 of this year as a tentative date for Coordicide’s rollout. However, this depends largely on the results of the incentivized testnet, Schiener said:
“A lot of that will depend on how well the incentivized testnet goes, that’s why we always say that the incentivized test network is the most important part of Coordicide. That’s where the research combines with the implementation to test in an open environment.”
Furthermore, Schiener addressed concerns regarding data sharding. The Value Tangle team, just like the Coordicide team, reviewed all the “paths” and possible implementation of this component. Schiener stated:
“I think when it comes to sharding, if I had to sum it up, I think the biggest risk is going to be building a solution that is going to kill IOTA adoption. In a similar way of how they said the biggest risk to Ethereum is Ethereum 2.0.”
What’s interesting to note here, is the analogy with ETH and ETH 2.0.
Keeping all the risks in mind, Schiener concluded:
“With that in mind, the team have received feedback from their corporate partners to create a solution that the market wants. In large part, Chrysalis will be the culmination of that feedback.”
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
XRP Price Analysis: 08 April
Decentralized oracle solution Umbrella Network adds Huobi as validator node
Tesla’s landlord accepts crypto; will Elon Musk pay rent in Bitcoin?
Why JP Morgan’s CEO calls Bitcoin regulation a “serious issue”
Bitcoin Miners Hit Jackpot as Hash Rate Peaks Again
Miners are hoarding Bitcoin from record daily earnings
Crypto sentiment falls even as Bloomberg tips Bitcoin will hit $400K
Revolutionizing the crypto-market in India with CryptoBiz exchange
$48B Asset Manager Millennium Management Dabbles With Bitcoin
Tendermint acquires B-Harvest, creator of Cosmos-based Gravity DEX
CoinMarketCap removes South Korea crypto exchanges from Bitcoin price tracker
Ontology’s cross chain DeFi lending platform Wing is now live on Ethereum
America’s Second-Oldest Bank State Street to Enable Crypto Trading on its Platform
Binance Smart Chain Daily Transactions 200% More Than Ethereum’s
3X as many crypto figures make it onto Forbes 2021 billionaires list as last year
Paxos applies for clearing license with SEC following successful pilot tests
Polkadot Price Analysis: 08 April
Digital yuan campaign planned for contested island in the South China Sea
How Chainlink’s (LINK) 22% rally could be just the start
Bitcoin exchanges just saw massive Tether stablecoin deposits
Blockchain1 week ago
ICON blockchain core developers add integration with Polkadot ecosystem
Blockchain1 week ago
A Question of Scale
Blockchain1 week ago
Ethereum, Cosmos, IOTA Price Analysis: 31 March
Blockchain1 week ago
XRP, Klaytn, Crypto.com Coin Price Analysis: 31 March
Blockchain1 week ago
Cross-Chain DeFi Protocol HARD Announces Version 2 Upgrade
Blockchain2 days ago
XRP Price Analysis: 08 April
Blockchain1 week ago
Uphold obtains FINRA approval to acquire US broker-dealer
Blockchain7 days ago
6 Questions for Wes Levitt of Theta Labs