Connect with us

Blockchain

US Regulators Issue Joint Statement on AML Compliance Involving Digital Assets

On October 11, the leaders of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a joint statement regarding anti-money laundering (AML) compliance for persons engaged in certain activities involving digital assets. While the statement largely reaffirms known agency guidance and existing regulations, it is… Continue Reading

Published

on

On October 11, the leaders of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a joint statement regarding anti-money laundering (AML) compliance for persons engaged in certain activities involving digital assets. While the statement largely reaffirms known agency guidance and existing regulations, it is noteworthy for a number of reasons.

First, the joint statement, issued from multiple regulators, is the first of its kind in the digital asset space with respect to AML and may indicate an intent of regulators to show that their approach to AML compliance is aligned and to coordinate more closely on AML compliance going forward. While each of the three regulators has published guidance regarding digital assets and has engaged in related enforcement actions, there has not been any public indication to date that such efforts have been coordinated across agencies.

Indeed, industry has sometimes felt regulators were pulling in different directions. For example, the degree to which protocol governance is decentralized may be an important consideration in determining whether a particular digital asset is a security (see additional analysis from Steptoe here). However, as protocol governance becomes increasingly decentralized it may simultaneously become more difficult to ensure the relevant ecosystem is not utilized for money laundering, terrorist financing, or other illicit activities. If this joint statement is an initial step toward closer inter-agency coordination, such a shift would likely be welcome by industry.

Second, the joint statement underlines that there are multiple ways a person dealing in digital assets may be considered a “financial institution” as defined in FinCEN regulations and the Bank Secrecy Act, the statute underpinning most AML regulations, and therefore required to comply with related AML regulatory obligations.

For example, persons exchanging or administering convertible virtual currency (CVC) will generally be viewed as engaging in money transmission, requiring them to register with FinCEN as a money services business (MSB) and comply with applicable regulatory requirements. (See FinCEN’s recent guidance here). Similarly, futures commission merchants and introducing brokers required to register with the CFTC and broker-dealers and mutual funds required to register with the SEC also have AML compliance obligations under the BSA.

The joint statement emphasizes “[t]he nature of the digital asset-related activities a person engages in is a key factor in determining whether and how that person must register with the CFTC, FinCEN, or the SEC” and that persons cannot rely on common industry usage of words such as “exchange” which may mean one thing in common industry parlance but another thing under the applicable regulatory regimes.

With respect to entities potentially falling within the scope of multiple regulatory regimes, the joint statement explains that “FinCEN’s BSA regulations also provide that any person ‘registered with, and functionally regulated or examined by, the SEC or the CFTC,’ would not be subject to the BSA obligations applicable to MSBs, but instead would be subject to the BSA obligations of such a type of regulated entity.” In other words, if an entity meets the definition of an MSB, but is also registered with and regulated/examined by the CFTC or SEC, it should follow the AML-related rules for such CFTC or SEC registered entities.

The joint statement also notes that regardless of the type of financial institution an entity is considered under the BSA, “all financial institutions dealing in digital assets meeting the definition of ‘securities’ under federal law must comply with federal securities law.” Therefore, an MSB dealing in unregistered securities could potentially violate applicable securities laws even if it did not otherwise meet the requirements for SEC registration.

While there are significant overlaps between the AML regulations applicable to MSBs and to CFTC and SEC registered entities, there are also some key differences, meaning how a financial institution is regulated can have important implications for its AML compliance program.

Overall, the joint statement does not appear to alter any of the agency’s previously stated positions, but it does underline the continued focus of the US government on AML compliance and highlights the necessity for companies in the digital asset space to carefully assess their compliance obligations and take steps to ensure they meet those obligations.

Source: https://www.steptoeblockchainblog.com/2019/10/u-s-regulators-issue-joint-statement-on-aml-compliance-involving-digital-assets/

Blockchain

EGLD Technical Analysis: Breakout of Price Beyond $240.83 Seen, Bullish Day Ahead

EGLD Technical Analysis: Breakout of Price Beyond $240.83 Seen, Bullish Day Ahead

Rate this post Elrond is described as a part of the technology ecosystem for the new internet, including, fintech, decentralized finance, and even the Internet of Things. Elrond platform is capable of performing 15,000 transactions per second, with a latency of six seconds. Let us look at the technical analysis of EGLD. Past Performance On September 16, 2021, EGLD started trading at $241.89. As of September 22, 2021, the closing price of EGLD was $230.51. Thus, in the past week, the EGLD price has decreased by roughly 4.90%. And, in the last 24 hours, EGLD has traded between $202.34-$241.99. https://www.tradingview.com/x/iqVxlFYS/ EGLD Technical Analysis The EGLD price is in a regression trend, which is trading in an upward direction. The price takes support from the support line of the trend and bounces back to the mid-range level. Currently, the price is trading near the mid-range and its long-term resistance level. As per the Elrond market behavior, we can expect it to give a breakout from this range.  Let us see what the indicators are indicating: Currently, EGLD is trading at $240.83. The price has increased from the opening price. Thus, we can witness some bullish momentum in the EGLD token. However, on the chart, we can see that the price is trading in an upward direction. A breakout can be on the horizon. On the daily chart, the MACD and Signal lines are in the positive zone. Moreover, by forming a bearish crossover by the MACD line over the Signal line. Thus, the overall market momentum is bearish, and we can expect the EGLD price to fall. However, both the lines are close to the zero lines and may change signs soon. Thus, there may be a trend reversal on the horizon. The RSI indicator is at 57%. It is currently resisting itself to move upward. Thus, the buying pressure can be seen mounting slowly. Hence, we can expect the price to rise again after a few hours. Day-Ahead and Tomorrow The EGLD price has fallen below the Fibonacci pivot point of $250. As some of the oscillators have shown bullish signals, we can expect the price to rise above the Fibonacci pivot level of $249.35 soon. A breakout from this level will highlight the next resistance at $273. The price has tested and fallen below the 23.6% FIB retracement level of $249.37. If the price falls below the 23.6% FIB extension level after some time, this implies that the price downtrend is strong. In that case, the price downswing is likely to continue tomorrow as well. Furthermore, the price can retest the support level at $202.87.

The post EGLD Technical Analysis: Breakout of Price Beyond $240.83 Seen, Bullish Day Ahead appeared first on Cryptoknowmics-Crypto News and Media Platform.

Published

on

Elrond is described as a part of the technology ecosystem for the new internet, including, fintech, decentralized finance, and even the Internet of Things. Elrond platform is capable of performing 15,000 transactions per second, with a latency of six seconds. Let us look at the technical analysis of EGLD.

Past Performance

On September 16, 2021, EGLD started trading at $241.89. As of September 22, 2021, the closing price of EGLD was $230.51. Thus, in the past week, the EGLD price has decreased by roughly 4.90%. And, in the last 24 hours, EGLD has traded between $202.34-$241.99.

TradingView Chart

EGLD Technical Analysis

The EGLD price is in a regression trend, which is trading in an upward direction. The price takes support from the support line of the trend and bounces back to the mid-range level. Currently, the price is trading near the mid-range and its long-term resistance level. As per the Elrond market behavior, we can expect it to give a breakout from this range.  Let us see what the indicators are indicating:

Currently, EGLD is trading at $240.83. The price has increased from the opening price. Thus, we can witness some bullish momentum in the EGLD token. However, on the chart, we can see that the price is trading in an upward direction. A breakout can be on the horizon.

On the daily chart, the MACD and Signal lines are in the positive zone. Moreover, by forming a bearish crossover by the MACD line over the Signal line. Thus, the overall market momentum is bearish, and we can expect the EGLD price to fall.

However, both the lines are close to the zero lines and may change signs soon. Thus, there may be a trend reversal on the horizon.

The RSI indicator is at 57%. It is currently resisting itself to move upward. Thus, the buying pressure can be seen mounting slowly. Hence, we can expect the price to rise again after a few hours.

Day-Ahead and Tomorrow

The EGLD price has fallen below the Fibonacci pivot point of $250. As some of the oscillators have shown bullish signals, we can expect the price to rise above the Fibonacci pivot level of $249.35 soon. A breakout from this level will highlight the next resistance at $273.

The price has tested and fallen below the 23.6% FIB retracement level of $249.37. If the price falls below the 23.6% FIB extension level after some time, this implies that the price downtrend is strong. In that case, the price downswing is likely to continue tomorrow as well. Furthermore, the price can retest the support level at $202.87.

PlatoAi. Web3 Reimagined. Data Inteligence Amplifed.
Click here for Free Trial.

Source: https://www.cryptoknowmics.com/news/egld-technical-analysis-breakout-of-price-beyond-240-83-seen-bullish-day-ahead/

Continue Reading

Blockchain

Bitcoin.org Hacked, Showing Sign of “Double Return Bitcoin” in Gift Scam


Bitcoin.org, an open-source and peer-to-peer platform focused on bitcoin development, was hacked this Thursday morning by showing bitcoin’s giveaway activities. (Read More)

Published

on

By

Bitcoin.org, a peer-to-peer (P2P) and open-source platform focused on bitcoin development was hacked this Thursday morning by showing bitcoin’s giveaway activities.

Starting at about 05:44 UTC on Thursday, a sign of “This website cannot be accessed” displayed on the Bitcoin.org website.

After that, an aside window popped up on the Bitcoin.org homepage, asking users to deliver Bitcoins to a dedicated address with an attached QR code and address, and claimed that it would be returned in double in the future.

The news stated that the campaign was targeted at the bitcoin foundation to give back to the user community that it has always supported and was limited to the first 10,000 users.

Bitcoin.org is not affiliated with the Bitcoin Foundation, but the site often appears when users search for bitcoin on search engines.

At present, the direct URL of the website cannot be accessed, and other subpages cannot operate normally.

The user is promised a doubled false promise through false gift fraud after transferring encrypted assets to this wallet address, causing the user to lose the transferred bitcoin.

According to the data on the chain, the receiving address has received 0.4 BTC in the past few hours, with a total value of more than $17,700.

Image source: Shutterstock PlatoAi. Web3 Reimagined. Data Inteligence Amplifed.
Click here for Free Trial.

Source: https://Blockchain.News/news/bitcoin.org-hackedshowing-sign-double-return-bitcoin-gift-scam

Continue Reading

Blockchain

Bitcoin, Ether, or XRP – The crypto of choice for terror funding is…

Published

on

It has been a tense time for Coinbase. The crypto-exchange recently felt the regulatory squeeze when the United States SEC reportedly threatened to sue if Coinbase launched its high-interest crypto product – Lend.

These developments, however, haven’t stopped the exchange from highlighting its efforts towards compliance. A recently-released Twitter thread is a case in point.

The crypto-exchange yesterday shared statistics about cryptocurrencies’ link to global terrorism, and what it is doing to combat the threat.

Coinbase investigates

Cryptocurrency’s “links” to terrorism are a major reason behind the FUD among international policymakers and regulators.

And yet, a report by Coinbase’s Special Investigations Team found that “illicit activity” made up less than 1% of all activities in the crypto-space in 2020. This was an observation arrived at after looking at the BTC, ETH, LTC, BCH, and XRP blockchains or ledgers.

About terrorism, the report stated,

“Further breaking down illicit activity, we find that transactions associated with terrorist financing (TF) in 2020 made up less than 0.05% of all illicit volume. As such, terror funding in cryptocurrencies remains extremely low in overall terms.”

It’s worth noting, however, that the report identified the Palestinian militant group Hamas as having raised the most funds among terrorist organizations.

Do terrorists have any preferences?

According to the said report, Hamas has collected more than $750,000 in Bitcoin since 2018. After Hamas, the Saudi-led jihadi activist movement has raised more than $250,000 in Bitcoin and altcoins. In third place, came an Al Qaeda-related exchange service.

Source: Coinbase Blog

Bitcoin was the most prominent crypto in terrorism financing, but the report also identified the growing popularity of altcoins such as XRP and Ether.

Bitcoin’s popularity could be due to its status as the biggest crypto and the coin’s relative stability. Meanwhile, XRP’s use case is similar to the cross-border hawala remittance practice common in Middle Eastern and South Asian cultures.

In order to stop terror funding campaigns, Coinbase claimed it would “blocklist” crypto-addresses related to such institutions, use its analytics, and work with agencies like the FBI.

Analyzing Hamas

Put simply, the Palestinian organization aims to destroy Israel. It has two main components – A military force and a social welfare arm.

In 2020, Chainalysis reported how the organization’s Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades (AQB) launched multiple campaigns to raise Bitcoin donations. Their tactics included instructional videos for both basic and experienced tech users, as well as unique payment addresses for every donor.

While crypto-terror funding is a small part of the vast DeFi sector, traders can expect to see more exchanges and companies keeping a watch on organizations classified as terror groups.

Where to Invest?

Subscribe to our newsletter

PlatoAi. Web3 Reimagined. Data Intelligence Amplified.

Click here to access.

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/bitcoin-ether-or-xrp-the-crypto-of-choice-for-terror-funding-is

Continue Reading
Blockchain5 days ago

Over 40 days after Ethereum’s EIP-1559, here’s where it stands

Blockchain4 days ago

Matic Price to hit $1.75 in the next leg up! Launch on Bitfinex to be the Catalyst?

Blockchain4 days ago

After Targeting BlockFi, State Regulators Now Set Their Eyes On Celsius

Uncategorized4 days ago

What is The Old Gym in NBA 2K22 Next Gen?

Uncategorized4 days ago

NBA 2K22 Limitless Spot-Up and Chef Badges Explained

Uncategorized5 days ago

Shiba Inu (SHIB) Rises to Range High

Uncategorized5 days ago

NFTs Are the Building Blocks of the Metaverse — Here’s How It’s Being Built

Blockchain5 days ago

Ripple’s Legal Team Says They Have No Plans To Settle With SEC Over Lawsuit On XRP Sales

Blockchain5 days ago

EY Taps Polygon Network to Improve Enterprise Clients’ Experience 

Uncategorized4 days ago

Best Dribble Pull-Up in NBA 2K22: Which to Use

Blockchain4 days ago

Flux Pools autoriza o pagamento de ativos paralelos em mais de 300K Flux!

News5 days ago

XRP Lawsuit: Here’s Why Experts Think Ripple Could Win the Case Against SEC

Blockchain4 days ago

All you need to know about MATIC before investing

Blockchain5 days ago

Shiba Inu’s days in the sun may be over; here’s why

Blockchain5 days ago

EOS: Why there’s a question mark attached to its long-term trajectory

Blockchain4 days ago

Smart Contracts Running on Bitcoin? Internet Computer Founder Explains How It’s Possible

Uncategorized2 days ago

PetPals, One Of The First Play-To-Earn NFT Web-Based Games Is Out Now

Uncategorized4 days ago

What is Phuture?

Uncategorized5 days ago

U.S. Homeland Security Signs $1.36M Contract with Coinbase

Blockchain5 days ago

TVL up by >990% in a year, but SushiSwap might be its worst enemy

Trending