1Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline Street North, Waterloo, Ontario Canada N2L 2Y5
2Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
3International Centre for Theory of Quantum Technologies, University of Gdańsk, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland
4Centre for Quantum Information and Communication, Ecole polytechnique de Bruxelles, CP 165, Université libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.
Abstract
A standard approach to quantifying resources is to determine which operations on the resources are freely available, and to deduce the partial order over resources that is induced by the relation of convertibility under the free operations. If the resource of interest is the nonclassicality of the correlations embodied in a quantum state, i.e., $entanglement$, then the common assumption is that the appropriate choice of free operations is Local Operations and Classical Communication (LOCC). We here advocate for the study of a different choice of free operations, namely, Local Operations and Shared Randomness (LOSR), and demonstrate its utility in understanding the interplay between the entanglement of states and the nonlocality of the correlations in Bell experiments. Specifically, we show that the LOSR paradigm (i) provides a resolution of the $textit{anomalies of nonlocality}$, wherein partially entangled states exhibit more nonlocality than maximally entangled states, (ii) entails new notions of genuine multipartite entanglement and nonlocality that are free of the pathological features of the conventional notions, and (iii) makes possible a resource-theoretic account of the self-testing of entangled states which generalizes and simplifies prior results. Along the way, we derive some fundamental results concerning the necessary and sufficient conditions for convertibility between pure entangled states under LOSR and highlight some of their consequences, such as the impossibility of catalysis for bipartite pure states. The resource-theoretic perspective also clarifies why it is neither surprising nor problematic that there are mixed entangled states which do not violate any Bell inequality. Our results motivate the study of LOSR-entanglement as a new branch of entanglement theory.
For the presentation “Why standard entanglement theory is inappropriate for the study of Bell scenarios” by David Schmid, please visit https://pirsa.org/20040095
[embedded content]
Popular summary
► BibTeX data
► References
[1] E. Schrodinger. “Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems”. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 31, 555–563 (1935).
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100013554
[2] Reinhard F. Werner. “Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model”. Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277–4281 (1989).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277
[3] Charles H. Bennett, Gilles Brassard, Claude Crépeau, Richard Jozsa, Asher Peres, and William K. Wootters. “Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895–1899 (1993).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895
[4] Charles H. Bennett and Stephen J. Wiesner. “Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881–2884 (1992).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881
[5] Charles H Bennett, Herbert J Bernstein, Sandu Popescu, and Benjamin Schumacher. “Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations”. Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046–2052 (1996).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2046
[6] Francesco Buscemi. “All Entangled Quantum States Are Nonlocal”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 200401 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.200401
[7] Elie Wolfe, David Schmid, Ana Belén Sainz, Ravi Kunjwal, and Robert W Spekkens. “Quantifying Bell: The resource theory of nonclassicality of common-cause boxes”. Quantum 4, 280 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-06-08-280
[8] Jonathan Barrett. “Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories”. Phys. Rev. A 75, 032304 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032304
[9] Lucien Hardy. “Quantum Theory From Five Reasonable Axioms” (2001).
[10] A. A. Methot and V. Scarani. “An Anomaly of Non-locality”. Quantum Info. Comput. 7, 157–170 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0101012
arXiv:quant-ph/0101012
[11] Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin, and Valerio Scarani. “Entanglement and non-locality are different resources”. New J. Phys. 7, 88–88 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/088
[12] Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin, Sandu Popescu, and Valerio Scarani. “Simulation of partial entanglement with nonsignaling resources”. Phys. Rev. A 78, 052111 (2008).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.052111
[13] Thomas Vidick and Stephanie Wehner. “More nonlocality with less entanglement”. Phys. Rev. A 83, 052310 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.052310
[14] M. Junge and C. Palazuelos. “Large Violation of Bell Inequalities with Low Entanglement”. Comm. Math. Phys. 306, 695–746 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-011-1296-8
[15] Antonio Acín, Serge Massar, and Stefano Pironio. “Randomness versus Nonlocality and Entanglement”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 100402 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.100402
[16] Yong-Gang Tan, Qiang Liu, Yao-Hua Hu, and Hua Lu. “The Essence of More Nonlocality with Less Entanglement in Bell Tests”. Comm. Theo. Phys. 61, 40–44 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/61/1/07
[17] R. Augusiak, M. Demianowicz, J. Tura, and A. Acín. “Entanglement and Nonlocality are Inequivalent for Any Number of Parties”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 030404 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.030404
[18] E. A. Fonseca and Fernando Parisio. “Measure of nonlocality which is maximal for maximally entangled qutrits”. Phys. Rev. A 92, 030101 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.030101
[19] Joseph Bowles, Jérémie Francfort, Mathieu Fillettaz, Flavien Hirsch, and Nicolas Brunner. “Genuinely Multipartite Entangled Quantum States with Fully Local Hidden Variable Models and Hidden Multipartite Nonlocality”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 130401 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.130401
[20] Victoria Kabel. “Exploring the Interplay between Entanglement and Nonlocality: A novel perspective on the Peres Conjecture”. PhD thesis. Ludwig Maximilians Universität München. (2017). url: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-3E8E-B.
http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-3E8E-B
[21] Florian John Curchod. “Nonlocal resources for quantum information tasks”. PhD thesis. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Institut de Ciències Fotòniques. (2018). url: http://hdl.handle.net/2117/123515.
http://hdl.handle.net/2117/123515
[22] Cédric Bamps, Serge Massar, and Stefano Pironio. “Device-independent randomness generation with sublinear shared quantum resources”. Quantum 2, 86 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-22-86
[23] Daniel Dilley and Eric Chitambar. “More nonlocality with less entanglement in Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt experiments using inefficient detectors”. Phys. Rev. A 97, 062313 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.062313
[24] Victoria Lipinska, Florian J. Curchod, Alejandro Máttar, and Antonio Acín. “Towards an equivalence between maximal entanglement and maximal quantum nonlocality”. New J. Phys. 20, 063043 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aaca22
[25] Artur Barasiński and Mateusz Nowotarski. “Volume of violation of Bell-type inequalities as a measure of nonlocality”. Phys. Rev. A 98, 022132 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.022132
[26] Miguel Navascués, Elie Wolfe, Denis Rosset, and Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens. “Genuine Network Multipartite Entanglement”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240505 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.240505
[27] Patricia Contreras-Tejada, Carlos Palazuelos, and Julio I. de Vicente. “Genuine Multipartite Nonlocality Is Intrinsic to Quantum Networks”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 040501 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.040501
[28] Ming-Xing Luo. “New Genuine Multipartite Entanglement” (2020).
[29] Dominic Mayers and Andrew Yao. “Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus”. In Proc. 39th Symp. Found. Comp. Sci. Pages 503–509. IEEE (1998).
https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1998.743501
[30] Dominic Mayers and Andrew Yao. “Self testing quantum apparatus”. Quantum Info. Comput. 4, 273–286 (2004).
https://doi.org/10.5555/2011827.2011830
[31] Ivan Šupić and Joseph Bowles. “Self-testing of quantum systems: a review”. Quantum 4, 337 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-09-30-337
[32] Valerio Scarani. “Device-Independent Self-Testing”. In Bell Nonlocality. Chapter 7, pages 86–97. Oxford University Press (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0007
[33] Bob Coecke, Tobias Fritz, and Robert W Spekkens. “A mathematical theory of resources”. Info. Comp. 250, 59–86 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2016.02.008
[34] Iman Marvian and Robert W. Spekkens. “How to quantify coherence: Distinguishing speakable and unspeakable notions”. Phys. Rev. A 94, 052324 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052324
[35] Lucien Hardy. “Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1665–1668 (1993).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1665
[36] A. Acín, T. Durt, N. Gisin, and J. I. Latorre. “Quantum nonlocality in two three-level systems”. Phys. Rev. A 65, 052325 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.052325
[37] Yeong-Cherng Liang, Tamás Vértesi, and Nicolas Brunner. “Semi-device-independent bounds on entanglement”. Phys. Rev. A 83, 022108 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.022108
[38] Valerio Scarani, Nicolas Gisin, Nicolas Brunner, Lluis Masanes, Sergi Pino, and Antonio Acín. “Secrecy extraction from no-signaling correlations”. Phys. Rev. A 74, 042339 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.042339
[39] Antonio Acín, Nicolas Gisin, and Lluis Masanes. “From Bell’s Theorem to Secure Quantum Key Distribution”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 120405 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.120405
[40] Antonio Acín, Richard Gill, and Nicolas Gisin. “Optimal Bell tests do not require maximally entangled states”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210402 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.210402
[41] Michael A. Nielsen. “Conditions for a Class of Entanglement Transformations”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 436–439 (1999).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.436
[42] John F. Clauser, Michael A. Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard A. Holt. “Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880
[43] N. David Mermin. “Quantum mysteries revisited”. Amer. J. Phys. 58, 731–734 (1990).
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16503
[44] Gilles Brassard, Anne Broadbent, and Alain Tapp. “Recasting Mermin’s Multi-player Game into the Framework of Pseudo-telepathy”. Quantum Info. Comput. 5, 538–550 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0408052
arXiv:quant-ph/0408052
[45] Elie Wolfe, Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, Matan Grinberg, Denis Rosset, Antonio Acín, and Miguel Navascués. “Quantum Inflation: A General Approach to Quantum Causal Compatibility”. Phys. Rev. X 11, 021043 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021043
[46] Otfried Gühne, Géza Tóth, and Hans J Briegel. “Multipartite entanglement in spin chains”. New J. Phys. 7, 229 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/229
[47] Luigi Amico, Rosario Fazio, Andreas Osterloh, and Vlatko Vedral. “Entanglement in many-body systems”. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517–576 (2008).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.517
[48] Tristan Kraft, Sébastien Designolle, Christina Ritz, Nicolas Brunner, Otfried Gühne, and Marcus Huber. “Quantum entanglement in the triangle network”. Phys. Rev. A 103, L060401 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.L060401
[49] Jędrzej Kaniewski. “Weak form of self-testing”. Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033420 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033420
[50] C.-E. Bardyn, T. C. H. Liew, S. Massar, M. McKague, and V. Scarani. “Device-independent state estimation based on Bell’s inequalities”. Phys. Rev. A 80, 062327 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.062327
[51] M McKague, T H Yang, and V Scarani. “Robust self-testing of the singlet”. J. Phys. A 45, 455304 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/45/45/455304
[52] Tzyh Haur Yang and Miguel Navascués. “Robust self-testing of unknown quantum systems into any entangled two-qubit states”. Phys. Rev. A 87, 050102 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.050102
[53] Cédric Bamps and Stefano Pironio. “Sum-of-squares decompositions for a family of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt-like inequalities and their application to self-testing”. Phys. Rev. A 91, 052111 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.052111
[54] Flavio Baccari, Remigiusz Augusiak, Ivan Šupić, and Antonio Acín. “Device-Independent Certification of Genuinely Entangled Subspaces”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260507 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.260507
[55] Yukun Wang, Xingyao Wu, and Valerio Scarani. “All the self-testings of the singlet for two binary measurements”. New J. Phys. 18, 025021 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/025021
[56] Andrea Coladangelo, Koon Tong Goh, and Valerio Scarani. “All pure bipartite entangled states can be self-tested”. Nat. Comm. 8, 15485 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15485
[57] I Šupić, A Coladangelo, R Augusiak, and A Acín. “Self-testing multipartite entangled states through projections onto two systems”. New J. Phys. 20, 083041 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aad89b
[58] Jamie Sikora, Antonios Varvitsiotis, and Zhaohui Wei. “Minimum Dimension of a Hilbert Space Needed to Generate a Quantum Correlation”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060401 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.060401
[59] K. T. Goh $et al.}$. “Geometry of the set of quantum correlations”. Phys. Rev. A 97, 022104 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.022104
[60] Flavien Hirsch and Marcus Huber. “The Schmidt number of a quantum state cannot always be device-independently certified ” (2020).
[61] A. Acín, A. Andrianov, L. Costa, E. Jané, J. I. Latorre, and R. Tarrach. “Generalized Schmidt Decomposition and Classification of Three-Quantum-Bit States”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1560–1563 (2000).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1560
[62] A Acín, A Andrianov, E Jané, and R Tarrach. “Three-qubit pure-state canonical forms”. J. Phys. A 34, 6725–6739 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/301
[63] Matthew McKague and Michele Mosca. “Generalized Self-testing and the Security of the 6-State Protocol”. In Conference on Quantum Computation, Communication, and Cryptography. Pages 113–130. Springer (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18073-6_10
[64] Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang. “Quantum Computation and Quantum Information”. Cambridge University Press. (2010). url: https://books.google.ca/?id=-s4DEy7o-a0C.
https://books.google.ca/?id=-s4DEy7o-a0C
[65] David Schmid, Katja Ried, and Robert W. Spekkens. “Why initial system-environment correlations do not imply the failure of complete positivity: A causal perspective”. Phys. Rev. A 100, 022112 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.022112
[66] Michał Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, and Ryszard Horodecki. “Limits for entanglement measures”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2014 (2000).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2014
[67] Guifré Vidal. “Entanglement monotones”. J. Mod. Optic. 47, 355–376 (2000).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340008244048
[68] Gilad Gour. “Family of Concurrence Monotones and its Applications”. Phys. Rev. A 71, 012318–1–012318–8 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.71.012318
[69] Nilanjana Datta. “Min-and max-relative entropies and a new entanglement monotone”. IEEE T. Inform. Theory 55, 2816–2826 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2009.2018325
[70] Charles H. Bennett, Sandu Popescu, Daniel Rohrlich, John A. Smolin, and Ashish V. Thapliyal. “Exact and asymptotic measures of multipartite pure-state entanglement”. Phys. Rev. A 63, 012307 (2000).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.012307
[71] W. Forrest Stinespring. “Positive functions on $C^∗$-algebras”. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 6, 211–211 (1955).
https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-1955-0069403-4
[72] Vern Paulsen. “Completely Bounded Maps and Operator Algebras”. Cambridge University Press. (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546631
[73] B. Kraus. “Local unitary equivalence and entanglement of multipartite pure states”. Phys. Rev. A 82, 032121 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.032121
[74] Bin Liu, Jun-Li Li, Xikun Li, and Cong-Feng Qiao. “Local Unitary Classification of Arbitrary Dimensional Multipartite Pure States”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 050501 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.050501
[75] H Barnum and N Linden. “Monotones and invariants for multi-particle quantum states”. J. Phys. A 34, 6787 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/305
[76] Jacob Biamonte, Ville Bergholm, and Marco Lanzagorta. “Tensor network methods for invariant theory”. J. Phys. A 46, 475301 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/47/475301
[77] Alexander A Klyachko. “Quantum marginal problem and N-representability”. J. Phys.: Conference Series 36, 72 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/36/1/014
[78] Michael Walter, Brent Doran, David Gross, and Matthias Christandl. “Entanglement Polytopes: Multiparticle Entanglement from Single-Particle Information”. Science 340, 1205–1208 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232957
[79] Daniel Jonathan and Martin B. Plenio. “Entanglement-Assisted Local Manipulation of Pure Quantum States”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3566–3569 (1999).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3566
[80] Aram W. Harrow. “Entanglement spread and clean resource inequalities”. In XVIth Int. Cong. Math. Phys. (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814304634_0046
[81] Patrick Hayden and Andreas Winter. “Communication cost of entanglement transformations”. Phys. Rev. A 67, 012326 (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.67.012326
[82] Christopher J Wood and Robert W Spekkens. “The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning”. New J. Phys. 17, 033002 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/3/033002
[83] David Schmid, John H Selby, and Robert W Spekkens. “Unscrambling the omelette of causation and inference: The framework of causal-inferential theories” (2020). arXiv:2009.03297.
arXiv:2009.03297
[84] Rodrigo Gallego, Lars Erik Würflinger, Antonio Acín, and Miguel Navascués. “Operational Framework for Nonlocality”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 070401 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.070401
[85] Kuntal Sengupta, Rana Zibakhsh, Eric Chitambar, and Gilad Gour. “Quantum Bell Nonlocality is Entanglement” (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.052208
[86] Jonathan Barrett. “Nonsequential positive-operator-valued measurements on entangled mixed states do not always violate a Bell inequality”. Phys. Rev. A 65, 042302 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042302
[87] David Schmid, Denis Rosset, and Francesco Buscemi. “The type-independent resource theory of local operations and shared randomness”. Quantum 4, 262 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-04-30-262
[88] Denis Rosset, David Schmid, and Francesco Buscemi. “Type-Independent Characterization of Spacelike Separated Resources”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 210402 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.210402
[89] Sandu Popescu. “Bell’s inequalities and density matrices: revealing `hidden’ nonlocality”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2619 (1995).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2619
Nicolas Gisin. “Hidden quantum nonlocality revealed by local filters”. Physics Letters A 210, 151–156 (1996).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(96)80001-6
[91] Rodrigo Gallego, Lars Erik Würflinger, Rafael Chaves, Antonio Acín, and Miguel Navascués. “Nonlocality in sequential correlation scenarios”. New J. Phys. 16, 033037 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/033037
[92] Joseph Bowles, Ivan Šupić, Daniel Cavalcanti, and Antonio Acín. “Device-independent entanglement certification of all entangled states”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 180503 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.180503
[93] Joe Henson, Raymond Lal, and Matthew F. Pusey. “Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalized Bayesian networks”. New J. Phys. 16, 113043 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/113043
[94] Tobias Fritz. “Beyond Bell’s theorem: correlation scenarios”. New J. Phys. 14, 103001 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/103001
[95] Elie Wolfe, Robert W. Spekkens, and Tobias Fritz. “The Inflation Technique for Causal Inference with Latent Variables”. J. Caus. Inf. 7 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2017-0020
[96] Charles H Bennett, Gilles Brassard, Sandu Popescu, Benjamin Schumacher, John A Smolin, and William K Wootters. “Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722–725 (1996).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.722
[97] Miguel Navascués and Tamás Vértesi. “Activation of Nonlocal Quantum Resources”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 060403 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.060403
[98] Carlos Palazuelos. “Superactivation of Quantum Nonlocality”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 190401 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.190401
[99] Asher Peres. “All the Bell Inequalities”. Found. Phys. 29, 589–614 (1999).
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018816310000
[100] Tamas Vertesi and Nicolas Brunner. “Disproving the Peres conjecture by showing Bell nonlocality from bound entanglement”. Nat. Comm. 5, 5297 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6297
[101] Anne Broadbent and André Allan Méthot. “On the power of non-local boxes”. Theo. Comp. Sci. 358, 3–14 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2005.08.035
[102] Carlos Palazuelos and Thomas Vidick. “Survey on nonlocal games and operator space theory”. J. Math. Phys. 57, 015220 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4938052
[103] Nathaniel Johnston, Rajat Mittal, Vincent Russo, and John Watrous. “Extended non-local games and monogamy-of-entanglement games”. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 472, 20160003 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0003
[104] Jonathan Barrett, Lucien Hardy, and Adrian Kent. “No Signaling and Quantum Key Distribution”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010503 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.010503
[105] A. Acín $et al.}$. “Device-Independent Security of Quantum Cryptography against Collective Attacks”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501
[106] Umesh Vazirani and Thomas Vidick. “Fully Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140501 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.140501
[107] Jędrzej Kaniewski and Stephanie Wehner. “Device-independent two-party cryptography secure against sequential attacks”. New J. Phys. 18, 055004 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/5/055004
[108] Roger Colbeck. “Quantum And Relativistic Protocols For Secure Multi-Party Computation” (2009).
[109] Roger Colbeck and Renato Renner. “Free randomness can be amplified”. Nat. Phys. 8, 450 EP – (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2300
[110] S. Pironio et al.. “Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem”. Nature 464, 1021 EP – (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09008
[111] Chirag Dhara, Giuseppe Prettico, and Antonio Acín. “Maximal quantum randomness in Bell tests”. Phys. Rev. A 88, 052116 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.052116
[112] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen. “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?”. Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
[113] H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, and A. C. Doherty. “Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.140402
[114] Beata Zjawin, David Schmid, Matty J. Hoban, and Ana Belén Sainz. “Quantifying EPR: the resource theory of nonclassicality of common-cause assemblages”. Quantum 7, 926 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-02-16-926
[115] Beata Zjawin, David Schmid, Matty J. Hoban, and Ana Belén Sainz. “The resource theory of nonclassicality of channel assemblages”. Quantum 7, 1134 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-10-10-1134
[116] Daniel Cavalcanti, Paul Skrzypczyk, and Ivan Šupić. “All Entangled States can Demonstrate Nonclassical Teleportation”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 110501 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.110501
[117] Ivan Šupić, Paul Skrzypczyk, and Daniel Cavalcanti. “Methods to estimate entanglement in teleportation experiments”. Phys. Rev. A 99, 032334 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.032334
[118] Matty J Hoban and Ana Belén Sainz. “A channel-based framework for steering, non-locality and beyond”. New J. Phys. 20, 053048 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aabea8
[119] Anurag Anshu, Aram W Harrow, and Mehdi Soleimanifar. “Entanglement spread area law in gapped ground states”. Nature Physics 18, 1362–1366 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01740-7
[120] Tomáš Gonda and Robert W Spekkens. “Monotones in General Resource Theories”. Compositionality 5, 7 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.32408/compositionality-5-7
[121] Jean-Daniel Bancal, Miguel Navascués, Valerio Scarani, Tamás Vértesi, and Tzyh Haur Yang. “Physical characterization of quantum devices from nonlocal correlations”. Phys. Rev. A 91, 022115 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.022115
[122] Gus Gutoski. “Properties of Local Quantum Operations with Shared Entanglement”. Quant. Info. Comp. 9, 739–764 (2009). arXiv:0805.2209.
arXiv:0805.2209
[123] David Schmid, Haoxing Du, Maryam Mudassar, Ghi Coulter-de Wit, Denis Rosset, and Matty J. Hoban. “Postquantum common-cause channels: the resource theory of local operations and shared entanglement”. Quantum 5, 419 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-03-23-419
[124] Miguel Navascués and Elie Wolfe. “The Inflation Technique Completely Solves the Causal Compatibility Problem”. J. Caus. Inf. 8, 70–91 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2018-0008
Cited by
[1] Martin Plávala, “General probabilistic theories: An introduction”, Physics Reports 1033, 1 (2023).
[2] Patryk Lipka-Bartosik, Henrik Wilming, and Nelly H. Y. Ng, “Catalysis in Quantum Information Theory”, arXiv:2306.00798, (2023).
[3] Miguel Navascués, Elie Wolfe, Denis Rosset, and Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, “Genuine Network Multipartite Entanglement”, Physical Review Letters 125 24, 240505 (2020).
[4] Elie Wolfe, David Schmid, Ana Belén Sainz, Ravi Kunjwal, and Robert W. Spekkens, “Quantifying Bell: the Resource Theory of Nonclassicality of Common-Cause Boxes”, Quantum 4, 280 (2020).
[5] Gilad Gour and Carlo Maria Scandolo, “Entanglement of a bipartite channel”, arXiv:1907.02552, (2019).
[6] Gilad Gour and Carlo Maria Scandolo, “Dynamical Entanglement”, Physical Review Letters 125 18, 180505 (2020).
[7] Andrés F. Ducuara and Paul Skrzypczyk, “Operational Interpretation of Weight-Based Resource Quantifiers in Convex Quantum Resource Theories”, Physical Review Letters 125 11, 110401 (2020).
[8] Joseph Schindler, Dominik Šafránek, and Anthony Aguirre, “Quantum correlation entropy”, Physical Review A 102 5, 052407 (2020).
[9] Xavier Coiteux-Roy, Elie Wolfe, and Marc-Olivier Renou, “No Bipartite-Nonlocal Causal Theory Can Explain Nature’s Correlations”, Physical Review Letters 127 20, 200401 (2021).
[10] Gilad Gour and Carlo Maria Scandolo, “Dynamical Resources”, arXiv:2101.01552, (2020).
[11] Elie Wolfe, Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, Matan Grinberg, Denis Rosset, Antonio Acín, and Miguel Navascués, “Quantum Inflation: A General Approach to Quantum Causal Compatibility”, Physical Review X 11 2, 021043 (2021).
[12] David Schmid, Denis Rosset, and Francesco Buscemi, “The type-independent resource theory of local operations and shared randomness”, Quantum 4, 262 (2020).
[13] Xavier Coiteux-Roy, Elie Wolfe, and Marc-Olivier Renou, “Any physical theory of nature must be boundlessly multipartite nonlocal”, Physical Review A 104 5, 052207 (2021).
[14] Ya-Li Mao, Zheng-Da Li, Sixia Yu, and Jingyun Fan, “Test of Genuine Multipartite Nonlocality”, Physical Review Letters 129 15, 150401 (2022).
[15] Eric Chitambar, Gilad Gour, Kuntal Sengupta, and Rana Zibakhsh, “Quantum Bell nonlocality as a form of entanglement”, Physical Review A 104 5, 052208 (2021).
[16] Gilad Gour and Carlo Maria Scandolo, “Entanglement of a bipartite channel”, Physical Review A 103 6, 062422 (2021).
[17] Denis Rosset, David Schmid, and Francesco Buscemi, “Type-Independent Characterization of Spacelike Separated Resources”, Physical Review Letters 125 21, 210402 (2020).
[18] Tomáš Gonda and Robert W. Spekkens, “Monotones in General Resource Theories”, arXiv:1912.07085, (2019).
[19] Francesco Buscemi, Kodai Kobayashi, Shintaro Minagawa, Paolo Perinotti, and Alessandro Tosini, “Unifying different notions of quantum incompatibility into a strict hierarchy of resource theories of communication”, Quantum 7, 1035 (2023).
[20] Patryk Lipka-Bartosik and Paul Skrzypczyk, “All States are Universal Catalysts in Quantum Thermodynamics”, Physical Review X 11 1, 011061 (2021).
[21] Elie Wolfe, Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, Matan Grinberg, Denis Rosset, Antonio Acín, and Miguel Navascues, “Quantum Inflation: A General Approach to Quantum Causal Compatibility”, arXiv:1909.10519, (2019).
[22] Valentin Gebhart, Luca Pezzè, and Augusto Smerzi, “Genuine Multipartite Nonlocality with Causal-Diagram Postselection”, Physical Review Letters 127 14, 140401 (2021).
[23] David Schmid, Haoxing Du, Maryam Mudassar, Ghi Coulter-de Wit, Denis Rosset, and Matty J. Hoban, “Postquantum common-cause channels: the resource theory of local operations and shared entanglement”, Quantum 5, 419 (2021).
[24] Gennaro Zanfardino, Wojciech Roga, Masahiro Takeoka, and Fabrizio Illuminati, “Quantum resource theory of Bell nonlocality in Hilbert space”, arXiv:2311.01941, (2023).
[25] Martti Karvonen, “Neither Contextuality nor Nonlocality Admits Catalysts”, Physical Review Letters 127 16, 160402 (2021).
[26] David Schmid, John H. Selby, and Robert W. Spekkens, “Addressing some common objections to generalized noncontextuality”, arXiv:2302.07282, (2023).
[27] Matthew Girling, Cristina Cîrstoiu, and David Jennings, “Estimation of correlations and nonseparability in quantum channels via unitarity benchmarking”, Physical Review Research 4 2, 023041 (2022).
[28] Shiv Akshar Yadavalli and Ravi Kunjwal, “Contextuality in entanglement-assisted one-shot classical communication”, Quantum 6, 839 (2022).
[29] Shiv Akshar Yadavalli and Ravi Kunjwal, “Contextuality in entanglement-assisted one-shot classical communication”, arXiv:2006.00469, (2020).
[30] Peter Bierhorst, “Ruling out bipartite nonsignaling nonlocal models for tripartite correlations”, Physical Review A 104 1, 012210 (2021).
[31] David Schmid, “Macrorealism as strict classicality in the framework of generalized probabilistic theories (and how to falsify it)”, arXiv:2209.11783, (2022).
[32] Tomáš Gonda, “Resource Theories as Quantale Modules”, arXiv:2112.02349, (2021).
[33] Kun Zhang and Jin Wang, “Asymmetric steerability of quantum equilibrium and nonequilibrium steady states through entanglement detection”, Physical Review A 104 4, 042404 (2021).
[34] Liang Huang, Xue-Mei Gu, Yang-Fan Jiang, Dian Wu, Bing Bai, Ming-Cheng Chen, Qi-Chao Sun, Jun Zhang, Sixia Yu, Qiang Zhang, Chao-Yang Lu, and Jian-Wei Pan, “Experimental Demonstration of Genuine Tripartite Nonlocality under Strict Locality Conditions”, Physical Review Letters 129 6, 060401 (2022).
[35] Kun Zhang and Jin Wang, “Entanglement versus Bell nonlocality of quantum nonequilibrium steady states”, Quantum Information Processing 20 4, 147 (2021).
[36] Valentin Gebhart and Augusto Smerzi, “Extending the fair sampling assumption using causal diagrams”, Quantum 7, 897 (2023).
[37] Beata Zjawin, David Schmid, Matty J. Hoban, and Ana Belén Sainz, “The resource theory of nonclassicality of channel assemblages”, Quantum 7, 1134 (2023).
[38] Peter Bierhorst and Jitendra Prakash, “Hierarchy of Multipartite Nonlocality and Device-Independent Effect Witnesses”, Physical Review Letters 130 25, 250201 (2023).
[39] Patryk Lipka-Bartosik, Andrés Ducuara, Tom Purves, and Paul Skrzypczyk, “The operational significance of the quantum resource theory of Buscemi nonlocality”, arXiv:2010.04585, (2020).
[40] Matthias Christandl, Nicholas Gauguin Houghton-Larsen, and Laura Mancinska, “An Operational Environment for Quantum Self-Testing”, Quantum 6, 699 (2022).
[41] Qing Zhou, Xin-Yu Xu, Shu-Ming Hu, Shuai Zhao, Si-Xia Yu, Li Li, Nai-Le Liu, and Kai Chen, “Certifying genuine multipartite nonlocality without inequality in quantum networks”, Physical Review A 107 5, 052416 (2023).
[42] Matty J. Hoban, Tom Drescher, and Ana Belén Sainz, “A hierarchy of semidefinite programs for generalised Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen scenarios”, arXiv:2208.09236, (2022).
[43] Sansit Patnaik, Mehdi Jokar, Wei Ding, and Fabio Semperlotti, “Distillation of non-locality inxA0porous solids”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 479 2275, 20220770 (2023).
[44] Ravi Kunjwal and Ognyan Oreshkov, “Nonclassicality in correlations without causal order”, arXiv:2307.02565, (2023).
The above citations are from SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2023-12-05 01:24:44). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.
On Crossref’s cited-by service no data on citing works was found (last attempt 2023-12-05 01:24:42).
This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.
- SEO Powered Content & PR Distribution. Get Amplified Today.
- PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. Empower Yourself. Access Here.
- PlatoAiStream. Web3 Intelligence. Knowledge Amplified. Access Here.
- PlatoESG. Carbon, CleanTech, Energy, Environment, Solar, Waste Management. Access Here.
- PlatoHealth. Biotech and Clinical Trials Intelligence. Access Here.
- Source: https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2023-12-04-1194/
