1. Crypto outperformed stocks and gold in Q2 but underperformed for the month of June
Overall, crypto outperformed stocks and gold in Q2. In the second quarter Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum were up 43.4% and 70.1%, respectively, with gold (+12%) and equities (+26%) also performing well (Table 1).
However, both BTC and ETH were down slightly for June, whereas stocks (particularly tech stocks) were up for the month. Gains in some growth stocks, such as Tesla (TSLA), which is now up ~5x over the last twelve months, contrast dramatically with a nearly flat BTC price over that same period.
Table 1: Price Comparison (% Change): Bitcoin, Ethereum, Gold, US Equities, Long-dated US Treasuries, US Dollar
The relatively greater volatility and price action of some equities is likely having a negative impact on crypto trading interest. For the second month running we saw major cryptocurrencies trading relatively flat and entering what could be characterized as a “don’t just do something, stand there” phase (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Bitcoin’s price has been largely range bound between ~$9,000-$10,000 for the past two months
Bitcoin has seen a dramatic decline in volatility in the three months since crypto’s Black Thursday on 12 March of this year. Indeed, bitcoin’s volatility is beginning to approach levels of some major fiat currencies, such as British pound sterling (GBP) (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Bitcoin’s declining volatility trending towards some “emerging market” currencies (eg British £)
How long will crypto prices remain flat, and which direction will they break?
While nothing in these monthly outlooks should ever be construed as investment advice, we did want to comment on historical periods when bitcoin’s price entered a seemingly similar “holding pattern”. For example, in early 2019 bitcoin’s price hovered around ~$4,000 for approximately four months before breaking upward ao approximately $13,000 (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Past instances when BTC’s price entered a multi-month “holding pattern” (consolidation phase) have often been followed by large upward moves
In 2015–16 we also saw another extended period of relative bitcoin price stability: in 2015 bitcoin’s price was hovering in the ~$250 range for an approximately six-month period, then climbed into the ~$400 range for a number of months (Figure 4). Towards the end of 2016, around the time of the last US presidential election, the price then started more rapidly ascending to ~$1,000, setting up a dramatic ~20x price increase in 2017.
Figure 4: BTC’s record setting upward price move coincided with the last US presidential election
While the above two examples highlighted periods when relative price stability was followed by significant upward price moves, it is important to note that there have also been instances where the reverse occurred. For example, for much of the second half of 2018 bitcoin’s price was trading largely in the $6,000-$7,000 range, until breaking sharply downward towards the end of the year and plummeting close to $3,000 in December 2018.
What would sustained lower volatility mean for crypto in the longer run?
Previously we have highlighted the numerous benefits of outsized cryptoasset price volatility, but it is also worth noting the double-edged nature of price volatility (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Outsized volatility is a double-edged sword for crypotasset adoption
Overall, it is our view that outsized volatility has been net positive for cryptoassets during the first decade+ of bitcoin’s existence, and that continued outsized volatility in the near-term may very well continue and remain a net positive.
However, as cryptoassets continue to mature and grow in terms of technology, size, liquidity, and sophistication (eg options and derivatives markets, greater institutional participation), it would be reasonable to expect volatility to trend down from historical levels over the longer-term. Also, as we discussed last month, lower volatility may also play a constructive role in the future regulation of cryptoassets as financial stability and systemic risk regulators consider how to respond to significant increases in cryptoasset usage and market size. In short, if change occurs too swiftly this could prompt a sudden regulatory backlash, whereas steadier changes may reduce the likelihood of a regulatory crackdown.
In sum, relatively lower volatility going forward is not necessarily something to view unfavorably, but may actually play a constructive role in increasing cryptoasset adoption.
2. On-Chain Analysis
Each month we dive into on-chain data to explore interesting trends or movements on the Bitcoin network.
We start at a high level with a look at network activity in June compared to May. Overall, after observing significant increases in network activity in May we saw June figures stabilize, with a slightly decreased market capitalization, slightly more transactions, and a lower number of active addresses (Table 2).
Table 2: Bitcoin network activity — June vs May
When we look at average network fees we can see there was significantly less network congestion and a resultant lower average fee per transaction in June, with the average fee per transaction at $1.28 as compared to $3.36 in May.
Another question we’re often curious about is how crypto usage is trending at the country level. In June we saw a number of countries increase their fraction of total Blockchain wallet transactions, most notably Vietnam, Bangladesh, and the South Africa (Table 3)
Table 3: Trending countries: increase in use in June over May
Continuing from May, Nigeria, South Africa, and Dominican Republic were once again in the Top-10 increasing country list. Bangladesh flipped from the Top-10 decreasing to increasing use, and the US dropped out of the top-10 increasing list.
Meanwhile, the fraction of transactions sent from China, Latvia and Belarus have decreased by 39.2%, 19.7% and 16.6% in comparison to April. China saw the largest decline in use in June and was the only country that remained from May in the list of top-10 decreasing use countries.
Table 4: Trending countries — decrease in use in June over May
Bitcoin ownership concentration
Bitcoin ownership distribution, as measured by the number of unique addresses owning a material quantity of bitcoin, continued to expand. The number of addresses holding at least 0.1 BTC was up +1.3% over May, and addresses holding at least 1 BTC increased +0.4% over May⁵:
- 3,078,873 addresses (10.1% of total addresses) have more than 0.1 BTC, and represent 98.9% of total bitcoins
- 819,587 addresses (2.7% of total addresses) have more than 1 BTC, and represent 95.0% of total bitcoins
3. The cryptocurrency endgame
Recently legendary investor and author Jim Rogers said that if cryptocurrencies like bitcoin ever become too successful that governments will “eliminate” them.
As remarkable as the rise of bitcoin and crypto has been in just a little over a decade — from zero to tens of millions of users and hundreds of billions in value — is Rogers correct that crypto is ultimately doomed? Will bitcoin become a victim of its own success, or be out-competed by central bank digital currencies?
A number of investors share Rogers’ skepticism around continued regulatory tolerance towards crypto, and this view has served as a justification for some to sit on the cryptocurrency sidelines. After all, what is the point of studying and investing in a new technology and asset if you believe any future success will either be capped or ultimately crushed by the long arm of the law?
However, as time passes there are more and more reasons to be skeptical of the view that governments will one day coordinate en masse and attempt to eliminate cryptocurrencies if they grow past some large, undefined size.
First, today’s “disunited nations”, and the decline in global cooperation that characterizes our present world, make it unlikely that hundreds of countries will simultaneously arrive at a unanimous regulatory view on cryptocurrency. There is also the difficulty of implementing globally any such crackdown given the decentralized nature of cryptocurrency.
But a perhaps equally important reason to be skeptical of Rogers’ view is the existing evidence of how cryptocurrency technology is already being regulated in key jurisdictions, particularly the United States, which continues to maintain outsized global influence over financial and technology regulation.
The dawn of significant cryptocurrency regulation, which many date to the 2013 US FinCEN guidance, set the tone for much of what has followed: regulators have generally attempted to strike a balance between fostering innovation while attempting to line up cryptocurrencies with various regulatory frameworks. The evidence of this more balanced approach by US authorities has continued to be seen across a number of key regulatory and legal developments, including:
While some smaller countries such as Switzerland have gone even further in creating an attractive regulatory environment for cryptocurrency, the US is by no means the only large country to create space for cryptocurrency use and growth:
Overall, most lawmakers and regulators around the world have not sought outright bans of cryptocurrency. This is at least partly due to the growing recognition of the innovative potential of cryptocurrency to help modernize our antiquated and inefficient financial system.
This brings us to the topic of a programmable US digital dollar, viewed by some as a potential existential competitive threat to cryptocurrency.
As we described recently on our blog, the topic of introducing a US digital dollar has become a high priority for several reasons, including the many inadequacies in our monetary and financial system painfully revealed by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Billions of stimulus dollars already appear to have been wasted due to various errors and inefficiencies, while a significant number of people have not been able to obtain the financial assistance they have been offered and so desperately need.
With a US digital dollar now appearing inevitable and possibly imminent, is there a chance that central bank digital currencies will obviate the need for cryptocurrencies like bitcoin?
While there is much still left to determine about the ultimate nature and feature set of a widely used digital dollar, our view is that it is highly unlikely a US digital dollar will “copy and paste” all major cryptocurrency features, or serve as anything remotely resembling a replacement for bitcoin.
Indeed, looking at a list of features often cited for bitcoin’s success and growth it is not clear a US digital dollar would seek to fully imitate even a majority of bitcoin’s key characteristics:
Even incorporating the bearer nature of US dollar banknotes/coins into a US digital dollar is by no means a settled question, as some leading digital dollar proposals call for a highly centralized digital dollar system based on the Federal Reserve’s existing centrally controlled account system.
Cryptocurrency characteristics much more likely to be included in a US digital dollar are technical resiliency, payments efficiency, and programmability. But a US digital dollar that only overlaps across these handful of dimensions would not destroy the entire value proposition of relatively more decentralized cryptocurrencies like bitcoin.
Further, there is even the possibility that blockchain networks like Ethereum may underpin a US digital dollar, much as blockchain networks today serve as the rails for many USD-pegged stablecoins. Other leading US digital dollar proposals call for a broad public-private partnership, where private sector corporations and platforms lead on technology development and deployment and play a critical role in the functioning of a US digital dollar. Such a partnership model would be attractive to many central banks, like the Federal Reserve, that are hesitant to convert into full service banks and offer accounts and services to millions of citizens.
Finally, it is also worth noting how rising US-China tensions factor not just in accelerating the rollout of a US digital dollar, but in how open blockchain networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum will increasingly come to be viewed from a geopolitical perspective. Nations such as the US that support the right of open expression and free movement of capital are in greater alignment with the censorship resistant nature of public blockchain networks than countries with more restrictions on speech and financial flows, such as China. In other words, the existence and growth of public blockchain networks have the potential to augment US values across an increasingly tense international stage and may find political support for these reasons as well.
4. Stablecoins: The new vehicle to flee capital controls.
Guest feature by Eliezer Ndinga from Amun
Today, June 9th, 2020, marks the first year since the beginning of Hong Kong protests where around a million people initially marched against Beijing’s extradition law to Mainland China. Over the past year, the protests rapidly intensified and fueled widespread unrest the month following the start of the demonstrations — especially due to police inaction the night a mob attacked a group of pro-democracy protestors.
The Amun research team has investigated how this unprecedented movement has gradually led to behavior changes regarding the use of cryptoassets, chiefly USD-pegged stablecoins, as a major investment vehicle for promptly fleeing capital controls in an attempt to preserve the wealth of Chinese individuals.
China Money Flowing to Singapore and Stablecoins
Over the past decades, the Asia Pacific region has accounted for almost 40% of the global billionaire population, with China being among the hottest wealth-generating hubs in the world — creating two new billionaires every week. Family offices have increasingly become popular vehicles to manage the wealth of high-net worth families in China or as a means to set up offshore accounts. But in the midst of capital controls and anti-corruption campaigns, there has been an increasing desire from less-wealthy Chinese families and individuals to move their capital out of China.
The emergence of a China-centred blockchain system, which would undoubtedly make it easier for the Chinese government to oversee and track the financial activity of its citizens, will not meet the rising need for financial freedom among some within China. The recent demonstrations have significantly triggered money flows to primarily Singapore — due to advantages such as long standing rapid air connections with China prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Although as an inherently digital, censorship-resistant, and neutral asset, Bitcoin has not been the first cryptoasset of choice to flee renminbi-denominated assets due to market volatility. USD-pegged stablecoins have ended up being just as attractive assets for those seeking to avoid losing large portions of their wealth due to price fluctuations over the short and medium terms. As a matter of fact, QCP Capital a Singapore-based cryptoasset trading firm, has witnessed Hong-Kong-based investors fleeing to Singapore and trading stablecoins, predominantly Tether, in an attempt to preserve their wealth.
According to QCP, 80% of capital has poured into stablecoins while the remaining 20% has gone into Bitcoin. This information is unfortunately not publicly available as much of crypto adoption in Asia happens underground especially following the crackdown on crypto exchanges by the Chinese government starting in 2017. For example, in Hong Kong, QCP Capital reported that investors trade Tether physically. This method is mainstream so that they are able to move money away cheaply and quickly compared to setting up an offshore account which might take almost a month due to stringent know-your-customer and anti-money laundering procedures. To mitigate counterparty risk, due to ongoing issues with identity fraud, QCP Capital follows KYC procedures and asks for collateral denominated in stablecoins.
The rising demand for encrypted messaging apps for public gatherings
In an effort to evade public gathering restrictions, as pro-democracy rallies raged in the territory, Hong Kong-based protesters have started to coordinate their actions using encryption-enabled messaging applications such as Telegram. In a similar manner, to meet and initiate trades QCP users communicate via a Telegram group, and many other similar groups owned by OTC desks or ran by regular investors, following a similar trend of building out their community via word-of-mouth growth.
The behavior changes we’ve seen due to these demonstrations are here to stay in the foreseeable future especially as crypto exchanges and other liquidity providers prevent China-based investors from opening accounts due to specific clauses in their terms and conditions — a phenomenon the 21Shares research team discovered in this study.
It is safe to say that stablecoins are becoming a pain-killer product for many investors in such situations. This capital outflow from renminbi-denominated assets to USD-pegged stablecoins will strengthen the US dollar hegemony as the world’s reserve currency. Nonetheless, with interest-bearing accounts like the one launched by Blockchain.com, there could eventually be capital flowing from stablecoins to Bitcoin by Chinese institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals, especially among tech-savvy cohorts
5. What we’re reading, hearing, watching
Large, Luxury Penthouse in Miami Sells for $22 Million in Crypto
One of America’s most luxurious penthouses just sold for more than $22 million – and the deal was completely finalized through cryptocurrency. The home consists of four bedrooms and is located within a condo building known as Arte by Antonio Citterio, which is situated in Miami Beach, Florida and designed by real estate developers Alex Sapir and Giovanni Fasciano.
Miami Real Estate and Crypto… A Perfect Match?
While crypto-real estate deals have been occurring over the past seven years, they are not common in any way, shape, or form. Typically, in America, all deals close through USD, but both Sapir and Fasciano expressed their excitement over the event and said in a recent interview that they always felt real estate and crypto went hand in hand… It was just a matter of time before people realized that, and as a result, they have consistently been open to homebuyers looking to pay their way with digital currency.
Sapir explains that there were several offers made on the residence, many of which would have also been done with crypto. He explained:
There is a strong, pent-up demand for cryptocurrency transactions that are seamless and secure for both parties, and the deal at Arte is a prime example of that. We were overwhelmed by the amount of calls we received from qualified buyers just after announcing our ability to facilitate cryptocurrency transactions. Real-world crypto transactions have not made their way fully into the mainstream yet, so it is quite clear top holders around the world pay attention when new opportunities to transact open up.
Fasciano says that with this sale, he has no doubt Miami could become a leader in crypto-based real estate sales, and he is hopeful that this will attract more digital investors to the housing mix. He says:
We are making Miami real estate history with this sale, as we were the first new development to facilitate this kind of cryptocurrency transaction, and to do so successfully so quickly after announcing. Cryptocurrency is the future of wealth, and we believe this is only the beginning. Arte has set the precedent for what these sales can look like and how fast they can take place. We are proud to have laid the groundwork for this new, burgeoning world.
Why Crypto Works Well
Sapir further stated what it was that inspired them both to accept crypto in the first place:
When we first set out to develop a boutique, resort-style oceanfront condominium for only 16 owners, no one had ever heard of anything so luxe and at such a small scale in Miami. It did not deter us, and we wanted to get ahead of a future world where half the world’s billionaires could have easily made their wealth from cryptocurrency. The quick sale of the Lower Penthouse at $22.5 million proves the success of the concept.
Ripple execs file new motion – What does it mean for their XRP sales contention?
The ongoing lawsuit filed by the SEC against Ripple Labs and its execs is showing no signs of slowing down or ending anytime soon. Ripple’s latest defense now challenges the SEC’s jurisdictional authority over the exchanges that Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen sold XRP to. As a matter of fact, the SEC, in its amended complaint, sought disgorgement for the two billion units of XRP sold by the execs on digital asset trading platforms located outside the U.S.
The individual defendants in the case have filed a motion seeking the court’s approval to request documents from over a dozen digital currency exchanges located “all over the world.” By doing so, the defendants want to establish that the XRP sales they made were beyond the jurisdiction of the regulatory agency. The individual defendants also argued in their motion that Section 5 of the Securities Act only applies to “domestic” sales and offers of securities.
Justifying the ultimate reason behind their international discovery request, their motion noted,
“The evidence to be obtained from the digital asset trading platforms is probative of the issue whether “irrevocable liability” was incurred outside the US with respect to these transactions.”
The third parties in question here include prominent exchange platforms like Upbit, Korbit, Huobi, Coinone, and Bitstamp. Additionally, the defendants’ letter stated,
“We understand that the Plaintiff, the Securities and Exchange Commission, does not object to this motion.”
With this motion, the defendants have requested the court to issue the attached letters of request for international judicial assistance and compel the aforementioned entities to produce documents. Here, it should be noted that the Court has the authority to request any competent authority of another state to obtain evidence. This motion is quite important for the defendants because it has the potential to provide them with concrete evidence before the close of fact discovery.
The Letters of Request to the entities seeks the assistance of the Central Authorities of Singapore, South Korea, Hong Kong, the U.K, Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands, Seychelles, Malta, and Northern Ireland to obtain documents relevant to the case that are otherwise unobtainable through other means from the entities.
“The Individual Defendants seek foreign discovery on the basis of their good faith belief that the listed entities possess unique documents and information concerning this case.”
According to the aforementioned motion, the entities could potentially produce evidence that specifically dealt with the transactions of XRP on their respective foreign digital trading platforms.
“There is good cause for the Court to issue the Letters of Request. The information sought in the document requests is narrowly tailored to obtain relevant information related to the case.”
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Analyzing ideal buy-entries for Ethereum, Cardano, Dogecoin for the next 24 hours
The cryptocurrency market might potentially be amidst another weekend correction. In a previous article, we analyzed whether there is an actual correlation between market dumps and the weekends. Multiple assets are shaky on the charts at the moment, and that includes the likes of Ethereum, Cardano, Dogecoin, among others. Keeping the notion of recovery in mind, we tried to identify a potential buy-range for these altcoins in order to maximize profits out of the dire situation at hand.
(Note: The analysis has been solely done from an analytical and fundamental point of view. It does not accommodate the possibility of any flash crashes)
Ethereum – Re-visiting the $2100s?
Ethereum, at the time of writing, was at a price range last seen towards the end of May 30th. The valuation was near the $2300 range, something that opens up the possibility for a couple of situations,
i) A bounceback from the support range of $2310-$2180
ii) Ideal re-test of Demand Zone at $2100-$1750
One of the reasons why the aforementioned support range could get invalidated is the fact that it has been tested before on 8th June. Now, while the Demand Zone has a wide range, it would be better for the asset to not close under $1880, which is a critical level and weekly support.
Hence, setting up buy entries between $2100-$1900 remains ideal, while cutting losses under $1880 if the market goes further south.
ETH’s trading volume ($27.6 billion) was also a clear indication that the market is adequate for recovery, but its social volumes have significantly dropped. And yet, historically, this level has acted as a point of reversal.
Dogecoin – Another free fall?
Dogecoin lacked a definite support range based on past price action. Coincidentally, its present price range has only been its bounceback level in the past. Now, presenting DOGE’s demand zone is more chaotic than other assets because its charts paint more of a flash-crash situation.
And yet, the ideal demand zone or buy range for the meme coin remains between $0.218-$0.184. A collapse below $0.184 should be directly met with sell-orders to cut losses, as the price could potentially meet its weekly support at $0.087.
One thing that makes it worrisome for Dogecoin to touch its demand zone is the lack of volumes. There might be no pullback considering the strength of trading activity was falling to its minimal range for the year 2021.
However, from a development point of view, its ecosystem has had more activity than ever before, which is a huge positive from a fundamental and long-term point of view. Overall, it is more ideal to set up entries after it bounces back from the Demand Zone than now while it is consolidating in it.
Cardano – Better not touch $1?
For Cardano, there remains a definite Support Range and Demand Zone. Just like Ether, it re-tested the support range of $1.40-$1.33. Unlike ETH, ADA’s support zone is stronger. Yet, strong corrections should mean meeting the demand zone between $1.17 and $1.05. Unlike other assets, it is imperative ADA remains above the Critical Level of $1 because it has maintained a position above this range since the beginning of February.
While Cardano had low trading volumes, it didn’t seem to be beyond salvation. Market momentum may switch up activity levels very quickly. However, it is essential to keep note of its low social dominance as only 2.36% of the ecosystem is talking about Cardano at the moment. Fundamentals are still strong for ADA, however. Ergo, buying within the demand zone should be fruitful.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
World Economic Forum Seeks to Offer Clear Policy Landscape For DeFi
The Colombian President’s Advisor to Peter Schiff: Stop Talking and Short Bitcoin
Pokemon GO: How to Get Alolan Slowpoke
World Economic Forum Releases a DeFi Policy Toolkit for Fair and Executable Regulations
How watching LoL Esports rewards viewers in summer 2021
Battlefield 2042 officially revealed
How Does Bitcoin Mining Work? Is It Profitable in 2021?
Where to find all the Alien Artifacts to unlock Kymera’s custom style in Fortnite Chapter 2, Season 7?
1,100 people arrested by Chinese Police on crypto-related money laundering charges
Axie Infinity Price Prediction 2021-2025: AXS Token Can Hit $40 by 2025
XRP lawsuit: Is the SEC ‘triply wrong’ about its latest filing?
XRP lawsuit: What’s the ‘existential threat’ Ripple is facing?
Troy Gayeski von SkyBridge: „Fiat-Investoren könnten alternativ auf Bitcoin setzen“
Trouble Looms For Bitcoin As U.S Looks to Bar Holders From Converting Crypto To USD
The Classic Meme Behind Dogecoin (DOGE) to Be Auctioned as an NFT
Doge meme Shiba Inu dog to be auctioned off as NFT
The UNICEF is investing in five crypto startups via Ethereum (ETH)
Third-Party Results of Credits’ Blockchain Speed Test
MT5 Will Phase Out MT4, but It Will Take Time
Gaugecash – The world’s first Decentralized Monetary System.
News1 week ago
Norton Adds Ethereum Mining To Its Suite of Antivirus Software Services
Blockchain1 week ago
I Bought and HODLed Bitcoin Since 2012: Legendary Skateboarder Tony Hawk
Uncategorized1 week ago
Localbitcoins Adds Bitcoin Cash and Other Cryptocurrencies as Payment Methods
Blockchain1 week ago
GTA 6 may Pay Players With In-Game Cryptocurrency Rewards
1 week ago
Overwatch League to host first live homestand with fans in 2021
Blockchain1 week ago
Philips to Accept BTC and ETH in a Banksy Auction
Uncategorized1 week ago
Did Elon Musk Just Pump…CumRocket?
Uncategorized1 week ago
Ethereum Co-Founder Has His Doubts Over Cardano’s “Scientific Method”