Uniswapi kogukond lükkas tagasi juhtimisettepaneku, mille eesmärk on muuta oma tasude mehhanismi, mis võimaldaks tulu jaotada märgiomanikele.

The voting period for the ettepanek closed on March 9, with 59.9% of mobilized UNI cast in opposition. The proposal sought to allow the DAO to make future changes to Uniswap’s fee mechanism, paving the way for activation of a long-awaited Uniswap “fee-switch” which could distribute protocol revenue to UNI holders.

The proposal was shot down two days after a separate ettepanek to enable protocol revenue collection was passed with borderline unanimous support.

Community members have long sought the activation of a fee-switch since Uniswap õhutati its UNI token to early adopters in 2020.

GFX Labs, the DeFi-focused research and development firm that co-authored the latest fee switch proposal, launched a similar ettepanek last year, suggesting that either 10% or 20% pool fees could be disbursed to tokenholders.

Ettepanek kukutati 45.3% vastuhäältega, samas kui 42.3% häältest toetas 20% tasu jaotust ja 12.3% 10% tasu, mis tähendab, et enamik hääli anti mingil kujul tasu muutmise aktiveerimise poolt. vaatamata sellele, et ettepanek lõpuks ebaõnnestus.

Tavaline kriitika sisse nõutud against the proposal was the risk of the Uniswap protocol or its core team incurring tax or legal liability as a result of fee distributions.

"Uniswapi valitsemises domineerivad vaalad (a16z, Hayden jne) keelduvad tasu muutmisest, kuna nad ei taha luua juriidilist vastutust," tweeted Chris Blec, otsekohene web3 kommentaator.

Ohud ja mured

Hiljutise ettepaneku ümber toimunud arutelud tekitasid muret turvalisuse ja tehniliste riskide pärast, mis on seotud Uniswapi DAO-l lubamisega teha muudatusi protokolli tasu mehhanismi aluseks olevas koodis.

“Upgradeable contracts introduce the ability for governance to rug token holders / ecosystem builders,” ütles Leighton Cusack, the founder of Pool Together. “It will be hard for this system to get traction if it can be changed.”

“If we were to adopt this amendment, each time that base-level contract infrastructure changed it would present technical and implementation risk that is not negligible… the entire system would need to be re-written, re-audited, and re-deployed,” ütles Erin Koen of the Uniswap Foundation. “A V3FactoryOwner or UniStaker that rewarded multiple stakeholders in different ways would have a necessarily complex internal accounting system. Each time one aspect of this system changed (say, gas rebates for swappers) the others would be at risk.”

CoinGecko andmetel langeb UNI 12.3% võrreldes 7. märtsi kohaliku tipptasemega.