Connect with us

Blockchain

A rational take on cryptocurrencies

What they are and what they’re not. Probably. Here at Coin Sciences, we’re best known for MultiChain, a popular platform for creating and deploying permissioned blockchains. But we began life in March 2014 in the cryptocurrency space, with the goal of developing a “bitcoin 2.0″ protocol called CoinSpark. CoinSpark leverages transaction metadata to add external… Read more »

Published

on

What they are and what they’re not. Probably.

Here at Coin Sciences, we’re best known for MultiChain, a popular platform for creating and deploying permissioned blockchains. But we began life in March 2014 in the cryptocurrency space, with the goal of developing a “bitcoin 2.0″ protocol called CoinSpark. CoinSpark leverages transaction metadata to add external assets (now called tokens) and notarized messaging to bitcoin. Our underlying thinking was this: If a blockchain is a secure decentralized record, surely that record has applications beyond managing its native cryptocurrency.

After less than a year, we stopped developing CoinSpark, due to both a push and a pull. The push was the lack of demand for the protocol – conventional companies were (understandably) reluctant to entrust their core processes to a public blockchain. But there was also a pull, in terms of the developing interest we saw in closed or permissioned distributed ledgers. These can be defined as databases which are safely and directly shared by multiple known but non-trusting parties, and which no single party controls. So in December 2014 we started developing MultiChain to address this interest – a change in direction that Silicon Valley would call a “pivot”.

Two years since its first release, MultiChain has proven an unqualified success, and will remain our focus for the foreseeable future. But we still take an active interest in the cryptocurrency space and its rapid pace of development. We’ve studied Ethereum’s gas-limited virtual machine, confidential CryptoNote-based systems like Monero, Zcash with its (relatively) efficient zero knowledge proofs, and new entrants such as Tezos and Eos. We’ve also closely observed the crypto world’s endless dramas, such as bitcoin’s block size war of attrition, the failures of numerous exchanges, Ethereum’s DAO disaster and Tether’s temporary untethering. Crypto news is the gift that keeps on giving.

Crypto and the enterprise

Aside from sheer curiosity, there’s a good reason for us to watch so closely. We fully expect that many of the technologies developed for cryptocurrencies will eventually find their way into permissioned blockchains. And I should stress here the word eventually, because the crypto community has (to put it a mildly) a far higher risk appetite than enterprises exploring new techniques for integration.

It’s important to be clear about the similarities and differences between cryptocurrencies and enterprise blockchains, because so much anguish is caused by the use of the word “blockchain” to describe both. Despite the noisy objections of some, I believe this usage is reasonable, because both types of chain share the goal of achieving decentralized consensus between non-trusting entities over a record of events. As a result, they share many technical characteristics, such as digitally signed transactions, peer-to-peer networking, transaction constraints and a highly robust consensus algorithm that requires a chain of blocks.

Despite these similarities, the applications of open cryptocurrency blockchains and their permissioned enterprise counterparts appear to be utterly distinct. If you find this surprising or implausible, consider the following parallels: The TCP/IP networking protocol is used to connect my computer to my printer, but also powers the entire Internet. Graphics cards make 3D video games more realistic, but can also simulate neural networks for “deep learning”. Compression based on repeating sequences makes web sites faster, but also helps scientists store genetic data efficiently. In computing, multi-purpose technologies are the norm.

So here at Coin Sciences, we believe that blockchains will be used for both cryptocurrencies and enterprise integration over the long term. We don’t fall on either side of the traditional (almost tribal) divide between advocates of public and private chains. Perhaps this reflects an element of wishful thinking, because a thriving cryptocurrency ecosystem will develop more technologies (under liberal open source licenses) that we can use in MultiChain. But I don’t think that’s the only reason. I believe there is a compelling argument in favor of cryptocurrencies, which can stand on its own.

In favor of crypto

What is the point of cryptocurrencies like bitcoin? What do they bring to the world? I believe the answer is the same now as in 2008, when Satoshi Nakamoto published her famous white paper. They enable direct transfers of economic value over the Internet, without a trusted intermediary, and this is an incredibly valuable thing. But unlike Satoshi’s original vision, I do not see this as a better way to buy coffee in person or kettles online. Rather, cryptocurrencies are a new class of asset for people looking to diversify their financial holdings in terms of risk and control.

Let me explain. In general people can own two types of asset – physical and financial. For most of us physical assets are solid and practical items, like land, houses, cars, furniture, food and clothing, while a lucky few might own a boat or some art. By contrast, financial assets consist of a claim on the physical assets or government-issued money held by others. Unlike physical assets, financial assets are useless on their own, but can easily be exchanged for useful things. This liquidity and exchangeability makes them attractive despite their abstract form.

Depending on who you ask, the total value of the world’s financial assets is between $250 and $300 trillion, or an average of $35-40k per person alive. The majority of this sum is tied up in bonds – that is, money lent to individuals, companies and governments. Most of the rest consists of shares in public companies, spread across the stock exchanges of the world. Investors have plenty of choice.

Nonetheless, all financial assets have something in common – their value depends on the good behavior of specific third parties. Furthermore, with the exception of a few lingering bearer assets, they cannot be transferred or exchanged without a trusted intermediary. These characteristics create considerable unease for these assets’ owners, and that feeling gains credence during periods of financial instability. If a primary purpose of wealth is to make people feel safe in the face of political or personal storms, and the wealth itself is at risk from such a storm, then it’s failing to do its job.

So it’s natural for people to seek money-like assets which don’t depend on the good behavior of any specific third party. This drive underlies the amusingly-named phenomenon of gold bugs – people who hold a considerable portion of their assets in physical gold. Gold has been perceived as valuable by humans for thousands of years, so it’s reasonable to assume this will continue. The value of gold cannot be undermined by governments, who often succumb to the temptation to print too much of their own currency. And just as in medieval times, gold can be immediately used for payment without a third party’s assistance or approval.

Despite these qualities, gold is far from ideal. It’s expensive to store, heavy to transport, and can only be handed over through an in-person interaction. In the information age, surely we’d prefer an asset which is decentralized like gold but is stored digitally rather than physically, and can be sent across the world in seconds. This, in short, is the value proposition of cryptocurrencies – teleportable gold.

On intrinsic value

The most immediate and obvious objection to this thesis is that, well, it’s clearly ridiculous. You can’t just invent a new type of money, represented in bits and bytes, and call it Gold 2.0. Gold is a real thing – look it’s shiny! – and it has “intrinsic value” which is independent of its market price. Gold is a corrosion-resistant conductor of electricity and can be used for dental fillings. Unlike bitcoin, if nobody else in the world wanted my gold, I could still do something with it.

There’s some merit to this argument, but it’s weaker than it initially sounds. Yes, gold has some intrinsic value, but its market price is not derived from that value. In July 2001 an ounce of gold cost $275, ten years later it cost $1840, and today it’s back around the $1200 mark. Did the practical value of dental fillings and electrical wiring rise sevenfold in ten years and then plummet in the subsequent six?

Clearly not. The intrinsic value argument is about something more subtle – it places a lower bound on gold’s market price. If gold ever became cheaper than its functional substitutes, such as copper wiring or dental amalgam, electricians and dentists would snap it up. So if you buy some gold today, you can be confident that it will always be worth something, even if it’s (drastically) less than the price you paid.

Cryptocurrencies lack the same type of lower bound, derived from their practical utility (we’ll discuss a different form of price support later on). If everyone in the world lost interest in bitcoin, or it was permanently shut down by governments, or the bitcoin blockchain ceased to function, then any bitcoins you hold would indeed be worthless. These are certainly risks to be aware of, but their nature also points to the source of a cryptocurrency’s value – the network of people who have an interest in holding and transacting in it. For bitcoin and others, that network is large and continuing to grow.

Indeed, if we look around, we can find many types of asset which are highly valued but have negligible practical use. Examples include jewelry, old paintings, special car license plates, celebrity autographs, rare stamps and branded handbags. We might even say that, in terms of suitability for purpose, property in city centers is drastically overpriced compared to the suburbs. In these cases and more, it’s hard to truly justify why people find something valuable – the reason is buried deep in our individual and collective psyches. The only thing these assets have in common is their relative scarcity.

So I wouldn’t claim that bitcoin’s success was a necessary or predictable consequence of its invention, however brilliant that may have been. What happened was a complete surprise to most people, myself included, like the rise of texting, social media, sudoku and fidget spinners. There’s only one reason to believe that people will find cryptocurrencies valuable, and that is the fact that they appear to be doing so, in greater and greater numbers. Bitcoin and its cousins have struck a psychoeconomic nerve. People like the idea of owning digital money which is under their ultimate control.

Against crypto maximalism

At this point I should clarify that I am not a “cryptocurrency maximalist”. I do not believe that this new form of money will take over the world, replacing the existing financial landscape that we depend on. The reason for my skepticism is simple: Cryptocurrencies are a poor solution for the majority of financial transactions.

I’m not just talking about their sky-high fees and poor scalability, which can be technically resolved with time. The real problem with bitcoin is its core raison d’être – the removal of financial intermediaries. In reality, intermediaries play a crucial role in making our financial activity secure. Do consumers want online payments to be irreversible, if a merchant has ripped them off? Do companies want a data loss or breach to cause immediate bankruptcy? One of my favorite Twitter memes is this from Dave Birch (although note that bitcoin is not truly anonymous or untraceable):

While it’s wonderful to send value directly across the Internet, the price of this wizardry is a lack of recourse when something goes wrong. For the average Joe buying a book or a house, this trade-off is simply a bad deal. And the endless news stories about stolen cryptocurrency and hacked bitcoin exchanges aren’t going to change his mind. As a result, I believe cryptocurrencies will always be a niche asset, and nothing more. They will find their place inside or outside of the existing financial order, alongside small cap stocks and high yield bonds. Not enough people are thinking about the implications of this boring and intermediate outcome, which to me seems most likely of all.

A pointed historical analogy can be drawn with the rise of e-commerce. In the heady days of the dot com boom, pundits were predicting that online stores would supersede their physical predecessors. Others said that nobody would want to buy unseen goods from web-based upstarts. Twenty years later, Amazon, Ebay and Alibaba have indeed built their empires, but physical stores are still with us and attractive to buy. In practice, most of us purchase some things online, and other things offline, depending on the item in question. There are trade-offs between these two forms of commerce, just as there are between cryptocurrencies and other asset classes. He who diversifies wins.

Now about that price

If cryptocurrencies will be around in the long term, but won’t destroy the existing financial order, then the really interesting question is this: Exactly how big are they going to get? Fifty years from now, what will be the total market capitalization of all the cryptocurrency in the world?

In my view, the only honest answer can be: I’ve no idea. I can make a strong case for a long-term (inflation-adjusted) market cap of $15 billion, since that’s exactly where crypto was before this year’s (now deflating) explosion. And I can make an equally strong case for $15 trillion, since the total value of the world’s gold is currently $7 trillion, and cryptocurrencies are better in so many ways. I’d be surprised if the final answer went outside of this range, but a prediction this wide is as good as no prediction at all.

Most financial assets have some kind of metric which acts to anchor their price. Even in turbulent markets, they don’t stray more than 2-3x in either direction before rational investors bring them back into line. For example, the exchange rates between currencies gravitate towards purchasing power parity, defined as the rate at which a basket of common goods costs the same in every country. Bonds gravitate towards their redemption price, adjusted for interest, inflation and risk, which depends on the issuing party. Stocks gravitate towards a price/earnings ratio of 10 to 25, because of the alternatives available to income-seeking investors. (One exception appears to be high-growth technology stocks, but even these eventually come back down to earth. Yes, Amazon, your day will come.)

When it comes to the world of crypto, there is no such grounding. Cryptocurrencies aren’t used for pricing common goods, and they don’t pay dividends or have a deadline for redemption. They also lack the pedigree of gold or artwork, whose price has been discovered over hundreds of years. As a result, crypto prices are entirely at the mercy of Keynesian animal spirits, namely the irrational, impulsive and herd-like decisions that people make in the face of uncertainty. To paraphrase Benjamin Graham, who wrote the book on stock market investing, Mr Crypto Market is madder than a madman. The geeks among us might call it chaos theory in action, with thousands of speculators feeding off each other in an informational vacuum.

Of course, some patterns can be discerned in the noise. I don’t want to write (or be accused of writing) a guide to cryptocurrency investing, so I’ll mention them only in brief: reactions to political uncertainty and blockchain glitches, periods of media-driven speculation, profit-taking by crypto whales, 2 to 4 year cycles, deliberate pump-and-dump schemes, and the relentless downward pressure caused by proof-of-work mining. But if I could give one piece of advice, it would be this: Buy or sell to ensure you’ll be equally happy (and unhappy) whether crypto prices double or halve in the next week. Because either can happen, and you have no way of knowing which.

If the price of a cryptocurrency isn’t tied to anything and moves unpredictably, could it go down to zero? Barring a blockchain’s catastrophic technical failure, I think the answer is no. Consider those speculators who bought bitcoin in 2015 and sold out during the recent peak, making a 10x return. If the price of bitcoin goes back to its 2015 level, it would be a no-brainer for them to buy back in again. In the worst case, they’ll lose a small part of their overall gains. But if history repeats itself, they can double those gains. And maybe next time round, the price will go even higher.

This rational behavior of previous investors translates into a cryptocurrency’s price support, at between 10% and 25% (my estimate) of its historical peak. That’s exactly what happened during 2015 (see chart below) when bitcoin’s price stabilized in the $200-$250 range after dropping dramatically from over $1000 a year earlier. At the time there was no good reason to believe that it would ever rise again, but the cost of taking a punt became too low to resist.

bitcoin-chart

So I believe that cryptocurrencies will be with us for the long term. As long as bitcoin is worth some non-trivial amount, it can be used as a means of directly sending money online. And as long as it serves this purpose, it will be an attractive alternative investment for people seeking to diversify. The same goes for other cryptocurrencies that have reached a sufficient level of interest and support, such as Ethereum and Litecoin. In Ethereum’s case, this logic applies whether or not smart contracts ever find serious applications.

On that subject, I should probably (and reluctantly) mention the recent wave of token Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) on Ethereum. For the most part, I don’t see these as attractive investments, because their offer price may well be a high point to which they never return. And the sums involved are often ridiculous – if $18 million was enough to fund the initial development of Ethereum, I don’t see why much simpler projects are raising ten times that amount. My best guess is that many ICO investors are looking for something to do with their newly-found Ether riches, which they prefer not to sell to drive down the price. Ironically, after being collected by these ICOs, much is being sold anyway.

Back to reality

There’s a certain symmetry between people’s reactions to cryptocurrencies and enterprise blockchains. In both cases, some shamelessly drive the hype, claiming that bitcoin will destroy the financial system, or that enterprise chains will replace relational databases. Others are utterly dismissive, seeing cryptocurrencies as elaborate Ponzi schemes and permissioned blockchains as a technological farce.

In my view, these extreme positions are all ignoring a simple truth – that there are trade-offs between different ways of doing things, and in the case of both cryptocurrencies and enterprise blockchains, these trade-offs are clear to see. A technology doesn’t need to be good for everything in order to succeed – it just needs to be good for some things. The people who are doing those things have a tendency of finding it.

So when it comes to both public and private blockchains, it’s time to stop thinking in binary terms. Each type of chain will find its place in the world, and provide value when used appropriately. In the case of cryptocurrencies, as an intermediary-free method for digital value transfer and an alternative asset class. And in the case of enterprise blockchains, as a new approach to database sharing without a trusted intermediary.

That, at least, is the bet that we’re making here.

 

Disclosure: The author has a financial interest in various cryptocurrencies. Coin Sciences Ltd does not.

Please post any comments on LinkedIn.

 

Source: https://www.multichain.com/blog/2017/07/rational-take-cryptocurrencies/

Blockchain

Robinhood Testing New Cryptocurrency Wallet as Demand Rises

Published

on

The millennial-focused trading portal is edging closer to launching a long-awaited app that will enable its growing user-base to send and receive cryptocurrencies.

A beta version of Robinhood’s iPhone app showed the company’s latest upgrades on the new digital asset features, according to Bloomberg.

There is a hidden image showing a waiting list for users eager to get their hands on the app and code referring to crypto transfers, it added.

Delving Deeper into Crypto

Robinhood users can already buy and sell cryptocurrencies on the platform but they need to convert them to and from USD. With a native app, users will be able to send crypto assets to each other directly and set up two-factor authentication for additional security.

Robinhood Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev stated that adding crypto wallets is a priority for the company’s developers and they are actively working on such.


ADVERTISEMENT

“The ability to deposit and withdraw cryptocurrencies is tricky to do with scale, and we want to make sure it’s done correctly and properly.”

He did not specify a launch date, but the beta app leak suggests it is not too far away. Users of the new functions will need to activate crypto sending and receiving and the registration page will require an identity check, the report added.

On Sept. 11, CryptoPotato reported that Robinhood had launched incentives to promote longer-term cryptocurrency investing. The zero-fee recurring purchase feature enables users to schedule digital asset purchases for regular intervals with buys as low as a dollar.

This will encourage customers to build their cryptocurrency portfolios over time and “become a whole coiner,” stated Robinhood.

Robinhood Users Hungry For Crypto

Cryptocurrency trading has been one of the biggest drivers of revenue for Robinhood this year. Dogecoin has been the crown jewel, according to the company. It reported that 62% of its $233 million in second-quarter crypto income came from DOGE trading.

It added that more than half of all transaction-based revenue on the platform came from digital asset trading. The firm did warn that Q3 would not be as prosperous due to “seasonal headwinds and lower trading activity across the industry.”

Robinhood share prices have already fallen 43% since their all-time high of a little over $70 in early August. They are currently trading down 1.68% since Monday’s open at $40.70 according to Yahoo! Finance.

SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)

Binance Futures 50 USDT FREE Voucher: Use this link to register & get 10% off fees and 50 USDT when trading 500 USDT (limited offer).

PrimeXBT Special Offer: Use this link to register & enter POTATO50 code to get 50% free bonus on any deposit up to 1 BTC.

You Might Also Like:


PlatoAi. Web3 Reimagined. Data Intelligence Amplified.

Click here to access.

Source: https://cryptopotato.com/robinhood-testing-new-cryptocurrency-wallet-as-demand-rises/

Continue Reading

Blockchain

Snoop Dogg Reveals His Connection With Twitter Account on NFTs

Snoop Dogg Twitter

Rate this post American rapper Snoop Dogg tweeted on Monday that he’s the owner of a Twitter account that talks about nonfungible tokens (NFTs). The account, named @CozomoMedici, shares “insights and tales from the wild world of NFTs” and has 27.7K followers at the moment. Snoop Dog Claims to Be Popular NFT Advocate on Twitter Snoop Dogg left the crypto community stunned this week after he revealed himself as the owner of a Twitter account dedicated to NFTs.  The account Cozomo de’ Medici, named after an Italian banker, is only a month old. However, it has already garnered attention from industry watchers and even a mention from crypto-focused news outlet The Block.   According to The Verge, the person behind the Medici account had been creating hype around their real identity for “at least a few days” and even conducted a poll for their followers to take a guess. The poll featured Democratic congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Matt Bellamy, the lead singer of the rock band Muse. Snoop, however, was not mentioned in the poll. On September 20, @CozomoMedici tweeted that they were about to reveal their identity from their account. Shortly after, Snoop Dogg tweeted “I am @CozomoMedici.”   Interestingly, after making this revelation, the Medici account bought two weed-themed collectibles from an artist named NyanDogg, The Verge reported. Additionally, Snoop’s alleged OpenSea account has been sent  “a cloud of blunt and Snoop-themed NFTs” following the reveal. Is Medici Account an Elaborate Prank? The Medici account could likely turn out to be an elaborate prank, one that Snoop might have engineered himself or just participated in. Many reactions to Medici’s reveal have also expressed skepticism about Snoop’s involvement. “I have a hard time accepting that this account is Snoop Dogg. Like seriously Snoop Dogg muted his live stream for a week (?) by accident. And he is that deep into NFTs out here owning crypto punks… Owning Eth using OpenSea. Would love that to be true but I can’t believe it,” Twitter user @Brandolf485 wrote in the comments. Nonetheless, the crypto community will have to continue looking for concrete proof till Snoop’s involvement with the account is confirmed. 

The post Snoop Dogg Reveals His Connection With Twitter Account on NFTs appeared first on Cryptoknowmics-Crypto News and Media Platform.

Published

on

American rapper Snoop Dogg tweeted on Monday that he’s the owner of a Twitter account that talks about nonfungible tokens (NFTs). The account, named @CozomoMedici, shares “insights and tales from the wild world of NFTs” and has 27.7K followers at the moment.

Snoop Dog Claims to Be Popular NFT Advocate on Twitter

Snoop Dogg left the crypto community stunned this week after he revealed himself as the owner of a Twitter account dedicated to NFTs. 

The account Cozomo de’ Medici, named after an Italian banker, is only a month old. However, it has already garnered attention from industry watchers and even a mention from crypto-focused news outlet The Block.  

According to The Verge, the person behind the Medici account had been creating hype around their real identity for “at least a few days” and even conducted a poll for their followers to take a guess. The poll featured Democratic congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Matt Bellamy, the lead singer of the rock band Muse. Snoop, however, was not mentioned in the poll.

On September 20, @CozomoMedici tweeted that they were about to reveal their identity from their account. Shortly after, Snoop Dogg tweeted “I am @CozomoMedici.”

Interestingly, after making this revelation, the Medici account bought two weed-themed collectibles from an artist named NyanDogg, The Verge reported. Additionally, Snoop’s alleged OpenSea account has been sent  “a cloud of blunt and Snoop-themed NFTs” following the reveal.

Is Medici Account an Elaborate Prank?

The Medici account could likely turn out to be an elaborate prank, one that Snoop might have engineered himself or just participated in. Many reactions to Medici’s reveal have also expressed skepticism about Snoop’s involvement.

“I have a hard time accepting that this account is Snoop Dogg. Like seriously Snoop Dogg muted his live stream for a week (?) by accident. And he is that deep into NFTs out here owning crypto punks… Owning Eth using OpenSea. Would love that to be true but I can’t believe it,” Twitter user @Brandolf485 wrote in the comments.

Nonetheless, the crypto community will have to continue looking for concrete proof till Snoop’s involvement with the account is confirmed. 

PlatoAi. Web3 Reimagined. Data Inteligence Amplifed.
Click here for Free Trial.

Source: https://www.cryptoknowmics.com/news/snoop-dogg-reveals-his-connection-with-twitter-account-on-nfts/

Continue Reading

Blockchain

TA: Ethereum Breaking This Confluence Resistance Could Spark a Recovery

Published

on

Ethereum started a major decline below the $3,200 support zone against the US Dollar. ETH price traded as low as $2,807 and it is now attempting a recovery wave.

  • Ethereum started a fresh decline below the $3,300 and $3,200 support levels.
  • The price is now trading below $3,200 and the 100 hourly simple moving average.
  • There is a key bearish trend line forming with resistance near $3,020 on the hourly chart of ETH/USD (data feed via Kraken).
  • The pair could a steady recovery wave if there is a close above $3,050 in the near term.

Ethereum Price Corrects Losses

Ethereum started a major decline from the $3,500 resistance zone. ETH traded below many important support zones near $3,300 and the 100 hourly simple moving average, similar to bitcoin.

The bears gained strength below the $3,200 support zone. Finally, ether spiked below $3,000 and extended its decline. A low is formed near $2,807 and the price is now correcting losses. There was a break above the $2,920 and $2,950 resistance levels.

The price recovered above the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the recent decline from the $3,455 swing high to $2,807 low. An immediate resistance on the upside is near the $3,020 level. There is also a key bearish trend line forming with resistance near $3,020 on the hourly chart of ETH/USD.

Ethereum Price

Source: ETHUSD on TradingView.com

A close above the $3,020 and $3,050 levels could start a decent recovery. The next major resistance might be near the $3,130 level. It is near the 50% Fib retracement level of the recent decline from the $3,455 swing high to $2,807 low. A clear break and close above the $3,130 level could start a steady increase. The next major resistance sits near $3,300.

More Losses in ETH?

If ethereum fails to correct higher above the $3,020 and $3,050 resistance levels, it could start another decline. An initial support on the downside is near the $2,960 level.

The next major support seems to be forming near the $2,900 level. A downside break below the $2,900 support zone could lead the price towards the $2,800 zone. The next major support is near the $2,750 level, below which ether price might decline towards the $2,640 support zone.

Technical Indicators

Hourly MACDThe MACD for ETH/USD is slowly losing pace in the bearish zone.

Hourly RSIThe RSI for ETH/USD is still well below the 50 level.

Major Support Level – $2,960

Major Resistance Level – $3,050

PlatoAi. Web3 Reimagined. Data Intelligence Amplified.

Click here to access.

Source: https://www.newsbtc.com/analysis/eth/ethereum-confluence-resistance-3050/

Continue Reading
Uncategorized5 days ago

Swissquote Confirms European Expansion Plan, Focusing on Crypto

Uncategorized5 days ago

Bingbon Launches its Carbon Free and Afforestation Project

Blockchain5 days ago

Massive NFT and Token Giveaway from Polker as Staking is Announced!

Uncategorized5 days ago

Nickelodeon All-Star Brawl will include DLC fighters post-launch

Blockchain3 days ago

Over 40 days after Ethereum’s EIP-1559, here’s where it stands

News4 days ago

Gods Unchained and Guild of Guardians Layer 2 Solution Immutable Raises $60 Million

Blockchain5 days ago

Opensea NFT marketplace Accuses Senior Employee of Insider Trading

Blockchain5 days ago

Grab a spot in Tomi’s presale by bagging an NFT – 260+ ETH raised!

Blockchain5 days ago

Kanga Exchange Partners with Tenset for an Exclusive Public Sale of KNG Token

Blockchain3 days ago

Cardano Sees an Influx in Smart Contracts ! But There’s a Twist

Blockchain5 days ago

If Shiba Inu is a ‘shitcoin,’ why are exchanges still listing it

Blockchain5 days ago

Over $1B Worth of ETH Burned in the Aftermath of Ethereum’s London Upgrade

Blockchain5 days ago

Ethereum, NEO, Dogecoin Price Analysis: 16 September

Uncategorized2 days ago

NBA 2K22 Limitless Spot-Up and Chef Badges Explained

News5 days ago

MicroStrategy Issues a Response to FASB’s 2021 ‘Invitation to Comment’

Uncategorized4 days ago

Laos Green-Lights Cryptocurrency Trials

Blockchain5 days ago

Bitcoin Cash: A 40% hike may be incoming from this setup

Uncategorized4 days ago

DeFi comes to Cardano (ADA) as EMURGO announces ‘Astarter’

Uncategorized5 days ago

Tether Claims to Hold no Commercial Paper From Struggling Evergrande

Blockchain4 days ago

Bitdefender Releases Tool To Decrypt Files Affected by REvil/Sodinokibi Ransomware

Trending